"I made a written report which is still today in existence. I have a photocopy of it, and I am saying that in production this aircraft could perhaps substitute for three propeller- driven aircraft of the best existing type. This was my impression"
About this Quote
Adolf Galland, the Luftwaffe ace who became General of Fighter Pilots, is recalling his early assessment of Germanys jet program, almost certainly the Messerschmitt Me 262. The claim that one production jet could replace three of the best propeller-driven fighters distills the leap that jet propulsion promised in 1943–44: overwhelming speed, crushing firepower, and the ability to dictate engagements. Against Allied bombers and their escorts, a machine that climbed faster, flew 100 mph quicker, and carried four 30 mm cannon looked like a force multiplier that could reset a losing air war.
The phrasing carries both confidence and caution. He says perhaps and calls it an impression, acknowledging that the evaluation was qualitative, based on trials and combat intuition rather than sustained operational data. By stressing that his written report survives and that he has a copy, he also stakes a claim in the postwar argument over how Germany used its dwindling resources. He had urged the 262s deployment as a pure interceptor; Hitler and others pressed for a fighter-bomber role that delayed and diluted its impact. The report is presented as proof that he recognized the jets potential early and fought the bureaucracy that squandered it.
Reality complicated the arithmetic. The Me 262 was fast but fragile, with short engine life, throttle lag, and long, vulnerable takeoff and landing runs. Fuel shortages, bombed airfields, scarce trained pilots, and Allied air superiority blunted its advantages. A jet might down bombers at a rate no piston fighter could match, yet sortie rates, maintenance burden, and attrition around bases meant the three-for-one substitution worked only in narrow circumstances.
The remark captures both the technological inflection point of the late war and a what-if laced with personal vindication. It frames the jet as the right weapon at the wrong time and under the wrong guidance, its promise undeniable, its decisive effect unrealized.
The phrasing carries both confidence and caution. He says perhaps and calls it an impression, acknowledging that the evaluation was qualitative, based on trials and combat intuition rather than sustained operational data. By stressing that his written report survives and that he has a copy, he also stakes a claim in the postwar argument over how Germany used its dwindling resources. He had urged the 262s deployment as a pure interceptor; Hitler and others pressed for a fighter-bomber role that delayed and diluted its impact. The report is presented as proof that he recognized the jets potential early and fought the bureaucracy that squandered it.
Reality complicated the arithmetic. The Me 262 was fast but fragile, with short engine life, throttle lag, and long, vulnerable takeoff and landing runs. Fuel shortages, bombed airfields, scarce trained pilots, and Allied air superiority blunted its advantages. A jet might down bombers at a rate no piston fighter could match, yet sortie rates, maintenance burden, and attrition around bases meant the three-for-one substitution worked only in narrow circumstances.
The remark captures both the technological inflection point of the late war and a what-if laced with personal vindication. It frames the jet as the right weapon at the wrong time and under the wrong guidance, its promise undeniable, its decisive effect unrealized.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|
More Quotes by Adolf
Add to List
