"I think film had a terrible effect on horror fiction particularly in the 80s, with certain writers turning out stuff as slick and cliched as Hollywood movies"

In the quote by Poppy Z. Brite, a nuanced review of the relationship in between movie theater and scary fiction-- and how this dynamic evolved particularly during the 1980s-- is presented. Brite recommends that the influence of film, particularly scary films which gained immense appeal in the late 20th century, had a perhaps harmful effect on scary literature. The use of the expression "awful result" highlights a sense of decrease or negative change in the quality or creativity of horror fiction during this duration.

Brite's criticism concentrates on the nature of scary writing throughout the 80s, defining it as "slick and cliched", associates frequently related to commercial Hollywood movie theater. The 1980s were a time when horror movies experienced a boom, driven by franchises like "Friday the 13th", "A Nightmare on Elm Street", and "Halloween". These films, while commercially effective, often leaned heavily on formulaic plots, dive scares, and predictable tropes to keep audiences engaged-- a formula that Brite appears to recommend was mirrored by some scary fiction authors of the time.

By stating that some writers were "turning out things" comparable to Hollywood movie theater, Brite might be regreting a perceived loss of credibility, imagination, or literary depth in the genre. In this context, "slick" may suggest work that is polished however doing not have substance, while "cliched" indicates a dependence on worn out stereotypes or overused narratives-- elements that possibly lessen the intricacy and creativity traditionally related to literary scary.

Additionally, Brite's observation could reflect a broader cultural review, recommending that the business pressures and the success of formulaic scary films influenced writers to prioritize marketability over innovation, modifying the landscape of scary fiction. In essence, Brite seems to promote for a go back to a more nuanced and innovative literary technique to horror that challenges readers, using depth and fresh perspectives rather than emulating the typically repeated and superficial design of mainstream scary cinema.