"I think I got spoiled and that writing a short story and getting it published, or writing a novel and getting it published, you pretty much get to do the first, second and third draft yourself without a whole lot of interference"

In this quote, John Sayles reviews his experiences as an author, emphasizing the autonomy and imaginative control he has actually enjoyed in the procedure of developing and releasing his works. Sayles suggests that he has been "spoiled" by the opportunity to supervise most of the writing procedure independently. This autonomy most likely consists of preparing and revising his work without significant external invasion, enabling him to maintain the integrity of his initial vision.

Composing, at its core, is deeply personal, and numerous authors treasure the ability to express their concepts without the heavy hand of outdoors influence. Sayles articulates this idea by highlighting the relatively undisturbed journey from initial draft to last publication that he has actually experienced. The recommendation to finishing the "first, second, and third draft yourself" highlights a rare benefit in the publishing world; lots of authors should navigate layers of editorial oversight, which can sometimes change the original intent of their work.

In addition, Sayles may be acknowledging that not all authors are managed this level of flexibility. The conventional publishing market typically involves substantial feedback from editors, publishers, and sometimes even marketing teams, each contributing to forming the story to appeal to broader audiences. This process can be both helpful and limiting, depending on the nature of the writer's work and their personal dispositions.

Furthermore, Sayles's reflection might mean a bigger commentary on the imaginative markets, highlighting a stress in between individual artistry and business cooperation. For emerging writers or those within more collaborative mediums like movie or television, imaginative interference can sometimes feel like a compromise. Sayles's sentiment, therefore, values the present of imaginative self-reliance, while acknowledging that it might be an exception rather than the guideline. His use of the word "interference" suggests that for some creators, excessive external input can diminish the credibility or pureness of their original production.