"I think I'm a very good reader of poetry, but obviously, like everybody, I have a set of criteria for reading poems, and I'm not shy about presenting them, so if people ask for my critical response to a poem, I tell them what works and why, and what doesn't work and why"

In this quote, Diane Wakoski expresses her self-confidence and assertiveness in evaluating poetry. She begins by stating, "I believe I'm a very good reader of poetry", suggesting self-assuredness in her capability to engage with and comprehend poetic works. This confidence is not simply subjective; it indicates a level of know-how and experience in literary analysis, recommending that she approaches poetry with an informed, critical eye.

Wakoski acknowledges the subjective nature of her analysis by keeping in mind that, "like everyone, I have a set of requirements for checking out poems". This shows that her assessments are directed by individual concepts and requirements, which are special to her literary point of view. These criteria might encompass numerous components such as thematic depth, linguistic development, emotional resonance, or structural coherence. By acknowledging this framework, she encapsulates the naturally individual nature of poetry criticism, where private interpretation plays a substantial function.

She follows by specifying, "I'm not shy about providing them", which speaks with her openness and candor in sharing her important opinions. This openness is important in literary discourse, as it invites dialogue and reflection, encouraging others to think about multiple viewpoints. Her willingness to articulate her criteria suggests that she values constructive criticism and is confident to take part in potentially tough conversations about art and expression.

Finally, Wakoski asserts that, when requested for her crucial response, she provides an honest assessment of "what works and why, and what doesn't work and why". This demonstrates her dedication to using thoughtful, detailed feedback, reinforcing her analytical technique. By elucidating the reasons behind her judgments, she promotes a much deeper understanding of the poem's strengths and weaknesses, adding to a richer gratitude of the poetic type.

Overall, the quote highlights Wakoski's self-confidence, vital acumen, and her desire to go over poetry openly and insightfully, emphasizing the subjective yet structured nature of literary analysis.