"I think it would be absolutely reckless and irresponsible for anyone to try and break up Microsoft"
- Steve Ballmer
About this Quote
Steve Ballmer's quote recommends that it would be reckless to try to separate Microsoft. He believes that such an action would be irresponsible and negligent, and could have severe effects. He is likely describing the potential antitrust suit that Microsoft faced in the late 1990s, which led to the company being broken up into 2 different entities. By saying that it would be irresponsible to separate Microsoft, Ballmer is implying that the business should stay intact which it needs to not go through any further legal action. He is likewise most likely revealing his belief that Microsoft is a vital part of the innovation industry and that it should be allowed to continue to innovate and grow. In conclusion, Ballmer's quote suggests that it would be risky to try to separate Microsoft, as it could have major repercussions for the company and the innovation industry as a whole.
This quote is written / told by Steve Ballmer somewhere between March 28, 1956 and today. He/she was a famous Businessman from USA.
The author also have 27 other quotes.
"I think Microsoft will have to change. I think that the business of Microsoft, the company of Microsoft, is going to continue to succeed. But I think the business model of Microsoft is going to have to change"
"I don't try to be a threat to MicroSoft, mainly because I don't really see MS as competition. Especially not Windows-the goals of Linux and Windows are simply so different"
"Microsoft has had two goals in the last 10 years. One was to copy the Mac, and the other was to copy Lotus' success in the spreadsheet - basically, the applications business. And over the course of the last 10 years, Microsoft accomplished both of those goals. And now they are completely lost"
"With our technology, with objects, literally three people in a garage can blow away what 200 people at Microsoft can do. Literally can blow it away. Corporate America has a need that is so huge and can save them so much money, or make them so much money, or cost them so much money if they miss it, that they are going to fuel the object revolution"
