"I think it's perhaps fair to say we've been one of the most influential Royal Commissions this country ever had and there's nothing we have said that isn't relevant to the present situation"

Frank Scott emphasizes the enduring significance and impact of the Royal Commission he was involved with, positioning it as a pivotal force in Australian history. He asserts that its influence remains unmatched, arguing that the insights, recommendations, and findings stemming from the Commission continue to speak directly to issues the country faces. Far from being a relic of the past, the body of work produced retains its relevance; the wisdom and prescriptions articulated by the Commission were prescient and foundational, encapsulating principles and solutions that still resonate in the nation's contemporary landscape.

Scott's statement serves as both a reflection and a subtle admonition. He invites readers to recognize how the problems addressed and tackled by the Commission are not obsolete, nor have they been thoroughly remedied. The challenges scrutinized, whether they involve governance, social justice, rights, or policy frameworks, persist in various forms. By declaring that everything asserted by the Commission remains pertinent, Scott underscores the cyclical or enduring nature of these issues, highlighting a continuity of struggle rather than finality. It is a call to revisit past recommendations and wisdom, suggesting that the answers or guiding principles for current predicaments may be found in the diligent work already completed.

Furthermore, Scott's words project a sense of pride and accomplishment, but not self-congratulation. The assertion of the Royal Commission's influence is coupled with a sense of responsibility; the implication is that transformative commissions serve their greatest purpose when their output is not relegated to archives, but instead inform and infuse ongoing policy debates, legislative reforms, and public consciousness. The continued relevance he claims is a measure of both the quality of the Commission's work and a subtle criticism of any failures to heed its lessons. Ultimately, Scott is making an argument for the value of institutional memory, the price of neglecting incisive analysis, and the hope that the nation will draw upon hard-won knowledge in facing the present and future.