"I think that the World Champion should try to defend the quality of play more than anyone else"
About this Quote
Spassky defines the title not as a crown for results but as a custodianship of standards. To be world champion is to set the tone for how chess is played and perceived: to choose principled moves over cheap swindles, to seek truth in complex positions rather than aim for sterile safety, and to carry the game forward through example. A champion wins, but the manner of winning matters most because it becomes the model others copy.
Coming from a player famed for a universal, harmonious style, the line draws on the ethos of the late Soviet era, when elite events could drift toward short draws, heavy prearrangement, and pragmatic risk avoidance. Spassky, champion from 1969 to 1972, stood between Petrosian’s iron prophylaxis and Fischer’s ferocious energy. He understood showmanship and responsibility: the public’s trust in chess as a test of intellect and imagination depends on the best player proving that genuine, high-quality decisions still decide games.
Defending the quality of play means resisting cynicism. It asks the champion to fight in worse positions, to eschew convenient repetitions, and to demonstrate the full richness of openings and endgames. It means turning preparation into a platform for over-the-board creativity, not a substitute for it. Such a stance may even cost half-points in the short term, but it enlarges the game’s horizons and inspires the next generation.
History supports the idea. Lasker’s psychology served deeper truth, Alekhine expanded dynamic possibilities, Kasparov pressed theory and initiative to new limits, and Carlsen insisted on playing for two results in dry positions to keep chess a sporting contest. Each, in a different way, defended quality.
The title confers authority, and with it a duty to the game’s future. If the champion prizes depth, courage, and accuracy, the whole ecosystem rises. If the champion prizes expedience, the culture shrinks. Spassky points to the higher obligation: win, but win in a way that protects the game’s soul.
Coming from a player famed for a universal, harmonious style, the line draws on the ethos of the late Soviet era, when elite events could drift toward short draws, heavy prearrangement, and pragmatic risk avoidance. Spassky, champion from 1969 to 1972, stood between Petrosian’s iron prophylaxis and Fischer’s ferocious energy. He understood showmanship and responsibility: the public’s trust in chess as a test of intellect and imagination depends on the best player proving that genuine, high-quality decisions still decide games.
Defending the quality of play means resisting cynicism. It asks the champion to fight in worse positions, to eschew convenient repetitions, and to demonstrate the full richness of openings and endgames. It means turning preparation into a platform for over-the-board creativity, not a substitute for it. Such a stance may even cost half-points in the short term, but it enlarges the game’s horizons and inspires the next generation.
History supports the idea. Lasker’s psychology served deeper truth, Alekhine expanded dynamic possibilities, Kasparov pressed theory and initiative to new limits, and Carlsen insisted on playing for two results in dry positions to keep chess a sporting contest. Each, in a different way, defended quality.
The title confers authority, and with it a duty to the game’s future. If the champion prizes depth, courage, and accuracy, the whole ecosystem rises. If the champion prizes expedience, the culture shrinks. Spassky points to the higher obligation: win, but win in a way that protects the game’s soul.
Quote Details
| Topic | Sports |
|---|
More Quotes by Boris
Add to List
