"I thought Nixon was getting ganged up on, but when I heard the tapes, I was shocked and terribly saddened"
About this Quote
Walter Annenberg's quote shows an extensive improvement in understanding relating to Richard Nixon, particularly in relation to the Watergate scandal. At first, Annenberg reveals a sense of compassion towards Nixon, thinking that he was being unfairly targeted or "ganged up on". This point of view might have been shaped by a sense of commitment, a typical belief during politically contentious periods, where figures seen as part of one's 'side' are typically thought to be victimized or persecuted unfairly by challengers or the media.
The phrase "joined forces against" recommends a feeling that Nixon was besieged by multiple opposing forces, potentially meaning a perception of bias versus him. This could show Annenberg's understanding of the political climate of the time, marked by intense scrutiny and criticism directed towards the Nixon administration.
Nevertheless, the turning point in Annenberg's point of view emerges upon hearing the infamous tapes, which contained recordings from the White House exposing Nixon's direct involvement in the Watergate cover-up. The tapes were undeniable proof of misconduct, fundamentally challenging Annenberg's previous belief in Nixon's innocence. This discovery is described as "shocking and terribly saddened", suggesting a deep sense of betrayal and frustration.
Annenberg's response highlights the power of incontrovertible proof to change understandings and beliefs. The psychological weight of the terms "shocked" and "extremely saddened" recommends a dispute in between his initial loyalty or belief in Nixon and the extreme reality provided by the tapes. This change can be viewed as a microcosm of the broader public disillusionment with Nixon during the Watergate scandal, highlighting how rely on political figures can be profoundly shaken by discoveries of dishonest behavior.
In summary, Annenberg's quote encapsulates a journey from uncertainty of the allegations against Nixon to an agonizing acknowledgment of his fault, illustrating the intricate interplay in between personal belief, evidence, and political truths.
About the Author