"I took thought, and invented what I conceived to be the appropriate title of 'agnostic'"
About this Quote
Thomas Huxley pauses on the act of naming and reveals a deliberate stance toward knowledge. By saying he took thought and invented the word agnostic, he asserts that the position needed its own clear label in an age crowded with confident metaphysical claims. In Victorian Britain, amid fierce debates over Darwinian evolution and religious authority, Huxley wanted a name that refused both dogmatic theology and dogmatic materialism. He fashioned it from the Greek roots meaning without knowledge, opposing the ancient claim of gnosis, special knowledge about ultimate things.
Agnosticism for Huxley was not a timid halfway house between belief and unbelief. It was a methodological ethic: follow reason and evidence as far as they go, and do not pretend to know what you do not. That principle reached beyond theology to any domain where proof fails and speculation tempts. He resisted the atheist label because it, too, can smuggle in an assertion of knowledge: that there is no God. He resisted religious dogma because it asserts knowledge where empirical warrant is lacking. Agnosticism, as he conceived it, demanded intellectual conscience, a discipline of withholding judgment in the absence of adequate grounds.
The setting matters. Huxley was Darwin’s bulldog, defending scientific inquiry in public arenas like the Metaphysical Society, where believers and skeptics sparred. There he needed a term that did not concede the rhetorical ground to either side. By coining agnostic, he sought to give skeptical empiricism a respectable banner, one that emphasized honesty over certainty and inquiry over creed.
His choice acknowledges the power of language to fix positions and shape debates. Naming the stance made it coherent, reproducible, and, crucially, moral: an obligation to evidence rather than to systems. The word endures because the problem endures. When evidence is silent or incomplete, agnosticism sketches a posture of humility and rigor that still speaks to scientific and philosophical conscience.
Agnosticism for Huxley was not a timid halfway house between belief and unbelief. It was a methodological ethic: follow reason and evidence as far as they go, and do not pretend to know what you do not. That principle reached beyond theology to any domain where proof fails and speculation tempts. He resisted the atheist label because it, too, can smuggle in an assertion of knowledge: that there is no God. He resisted religious dogma because it asserts knowledge where empirical warrant is lacking. Agnosticism, as he conceived it, demanded intellectual conscience, a discipline of withholding judgment in the absence of adequate grounds.
The setting matters. Huxley was Darwin’s bulldog, defending scientific inquiry in public arenas like the Metaphysical Society, where believers and skeptics sparred. There he needed a term that did not concede the rhetorical ground to either side. By coining agnostic, he sought to give skeptical empiricism a respectable banner, one that emphasized honesty over certainty and inquiry over creed.
His choice acknowledges the power of language to fix positions and shape debates. Naming the stance made it coherent, reproducible, and, crucially, moral: an obligation to evidence rather than to systems. The word endures because the problem endures. When evidence is silent or incomplete, agnosticism sketches a posture of humility and rigor that still speaks to scientific and philosophical conscience.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|
More Quotes by Thomas
Add to List
