"I was sympathetic to virtually all groups that wanted to get away from the old system"
About this Quote
A sitting Supreme Court justice admitting he felt “sympathetic to virtually all groups that wanted to get away from the old system” is less a kumbaya gesture than a glimpse of a governing temperament: suspicion toward inherited authority, and an instinct to side with outsiders trying to route around gatekeepers. Clarence Thomas isn’t praising protest as such; he’s signaling a deep comfort with rupture when institutions feel rigged, stagnant, or self-protecting.
“Virtually all groups” is the tell. It’s expansive enough to sound generous, but hedged enough to preserve judgment: sympathy is not endorsement, and “virtually” creates space to disown movements that threaten his moral or constitutional commitments. The target is “the old system,” a phrase that turns bureaucracy, elite consensus, and paternalism into a single, blunt antagonist. It’s a populist shorthand, but also a personal one. Thomas’s biography - raised in the Jim Crow South, shaped by resentment of condescension from liberal institutions, skeptical of credentialed benevolence - makes “old system” read as both racial hierarchy and the post-60s managerial order that claimed to fix it.
Context matters because Thomas’s jurisprudence often marries radical dissatisfaction with institutional outcomes to a conservative method: originalism as a way to dethrone contemporary power brokers while insisting he’s merely restoring constitutional first principles. The subtext is that rebellion can be legitimate when it’s aimed at the right target: entrenched systems, not the foundational text he treats as the real counter-establishment. It’s a remarkably candid window into how an apparent institutionalist can think like an insurgent.
“Virtually all groups” is the tell. It’s expansive enough to sound generous, but hedged enough to preserve judgment: sympathy is not endorsement, and “virtually” creates space to disown movements that threaten his moral or constitutional commitments. The target is “the old system,” a phrase that turns bureaucracy, elite consensus, and paternalism into a single, blunt antagonist. It’s a populist shorthand, but also a personal one. Thomas’s biography - raised in the Jim Crow South, shaped by resentment of condescension from liberal institutions, skeptical of credentialed benevolence - makes “old system” read as both racial hierarchy and the post-60s managerial order that claimed to fix it.
Context matters because Thomas’s jurisprudence often marries radical dissatisfaction with institutional outcomes to a conservative method: originalism as a way to dethrone contemporary power brokers while insisting he’s merely restoring constitutional first principles. The subtext is that rebellion can be legitimate when it’s aimed at the right target: entrenched systems, not the foundational text he treats as the real counter-establishment. It’s a remarkably candid window into how an apparent institutionalist can think like an insurgent.
Quote Details
| Topic | Change |
|---|
More Quotes by Clarence
Add to List
