"I wrote for a weekly magazine and then edited a literary magazine, but I did not really feel comfortable with the profession of journalism itself"

Certainly! This quote by Guillermo Cabrera Infante reveals a nuanced perspective on his relationship with journalism and writing. At first look, it might seem inconsistent; after all, composing and modifying are core aspects of journalism. Nevertheless, the difference he makes is deeply personal and reflects his internal conflict with the occupation itself.

Cabrera Infante shares that he actively participated in the journalistic field, engaging with its processes by writing for a weekly magazine and later modifying a literary magazine. This indicates that he has a thorough understanding and ability in journalism, suggesting efficiency and possibly even some level of accomplishment in the field. Yet, regardless of this active participation, he exposes an underlying pain with journalism as an occupation.

This pain could develop from several factors. For one, Cabrera Infante was primarily understood for his work as a novelist, film writer, and critic, where imaginative expression and literary artistry are focused on over factual reporting and the objective dissemination of news. Journalism, while it can be an avenue for creativity, often requires adherence to specific structures, due dates, and objectivity, which may suppress the type of intellectual freedom Cabrera Infante valued as an artist.

Additionally, his discomfort may come from ideological or ethical issues. Cabrera Infante lived through turbulent political times in Cuba and was known for his criticism of the routine. The role of journalism, frequently viewed as a tool for influencing public opinion and social modification, might have contravened his individual beliefs or experiences.

Eventually, this quote unveils a complicated interaction in between his identity as a writer and his views on journalism. It suggests a personal journey of fixing up the abilities and activities he excelled in with the professional identity he was less at ease with. This internal tension highlights the wider struggle many creatives face in balancing individual expression with expert roles.