"I'd never painted anything before. I was quite content to take other people's work since I didn't care anyway about the subject matter. I approached subject matter as a scoundrel. I had nothing to say about it whatsoever. I only wanted to make these exciting paintings"
About this Quote
Wesselmann’s admission is both a provocation and a manifesto. By claiming indifference to subject matter and confessing to “taking other people’s work,” he rejects the modernist burden that paintings must be vessels of profound, original content. The subject becomes raw material, a convenient scaffold for visual intensity. Calling himself a “scoundrel” embraces the transgressive energy of Pop: appropriation without apology, irreverence toward authorship, and a frank alignment with the seductive surfaces of mass culture. Rather than the artist as prophet, he proposes the artist as arranger of pleasures, color, shape, scale, and edge.
What he wanted, “exciting paintings”, transfers meaning from the depicted object to the painting’s operation on the viewer. Excitement here is not trivial; it is a rigorous aim: the calibration of contrast, the economy of contour, the audacity of cropping, the sheer immediacy of forms that read as quickly as a billboard but reward prolonged looking. If the subject is borrowed, the transformation lies in how it is cut, amplified, flattened, or monumentalized. The supposed emptiness, “nothing to say”, is a strategic vacuum that lets the formal decisions speak. In that space, the erotic and the commercial become pictorial energies rather than messages, and visual desire is treated as an artistic medium.
There is also a sly critique embedded in the posture. To “not care” about subject matter in a culture saturated with images is to show how images already care for us: they solicit, command, and organize attention. By leaning into that economy of attraction, he exposes its mechanics while exploiting them. The result is a paradoxical honesty: a painting that renounces depth-as-message yet achieves intensity-as-experience; a work that is shameless about its sources yet unmistakable in its authorship. Wesselmann’s stance reframes painting as a technology of looking. The subject may be borrowed, but the excitement is invented, disciplined, and entirely his.
What he wanted, “exciting paintings”, transfers meaning from the depicted object to the painting’s operation on the viewer. Excitement here is not trivial; it is a rigorous aim: the calibration of contrast, the economy of contour, the audacity of cropping, the sheer immediacy of forms that read as quickly as a billboard but reward prolonged looking. If the subject is borrowed, the transformation lies in how it is cut, amplified, flattened, or monumentalized. The supposed emptiness, “nothing to say”, is a strategic vacuum that lets the formal decisions speak. In that space, the erotic and the commercial become pictorial energies rather than messages, and visual desire is treated as an artistic medium.
There is also a sly critique embedded in the posture. To “not care” about subject matter in a culture saturated with images is to show how images already care for us: they solicit, command, and organize attention. By leaning into that economy of attraction, he exposes its mechanics while exploiting them. The result is a paradoxical honesty: a painting that renounces depth-as-message yet achieves intensity-as-experience; a work that is shameless about its sources yet unmistakable in its authorship. Wesselmann’s stance reframes painting as a technology of looking. The subject may be borrowed, but the excitement is invented, disciplined, and entirely his.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Tom
Add to List
