"If a person is not talented enough to be a novelist, not smart enough to be a lawyer, and his hands are too shaky to perform operations, he becomes a journalist"
About this Quote
Mailer fires a deliberately caustic shot at journalism, casting it as the fallback for those who cannot master higher arts or higher-stakes professions. The joke works by ranking social roles: the novelist embodies creative genius, the lawyer analytic brilliance, the surgeon supreme precision. By contrast, the journalist appears to require neither deep talent nor rare skill, only a quick pen and a tolerance for deadlines. The barb is funny because it is cruel, and revealing because it trades on status anxiety in the literary and professional worlds.
The irony is that Mailer spent much of his career practicing journalism and trying to transform it. A co-founder of the Village Voice and a central figure in New Journalism, he produced book-length reportage that he called a nonfiction novel, turning political conventions, protests, and crimes into narrative art. The mockery lands less on reporting as such than on its conventional forms: formulaic prose, rote objectivity, flattened voice. He is taking a swing at the newsroom culture that prizes speed and summary over insight, not at the possibility that factual writing can be art.
There is also a philosophical hierarchy at work. Mailer believed the novel could grasp a deeper human truth than daily news items and courtroom briefs. Surgeons and lawyers are bound to utility and rules; the novelist, in his self-conception, is bound to vision. Journalism, constrained by verification and institutional pressures yet lacking the prestige of life-or-death consequences, becomes the soft middle. The line exposes a rivalry over who gets to define truth and who earns cultural authority for doing so.
Read against later triumphs of investigative reporting and war correspondence, the sneer looks both provocative and deliberately unfair. That tension is the point. Mailer goads his audience to defend journalism by demanding more of it, just as he demanded that his own reportage aspire to the ambitions of the novel.
The irony is that Mailer spent much of his career practicing journalism and trying to transform it. A co-founder of the Village Voice and a central figure in New Journalism, he produced book-length reportage that he called a nonfiction novel, turning political conventions, protests, and crimes into narrative art. The mockery lands less on reporting as such than on its conventional forms: formulaic prose, rote objectivity, flattened voice. He is taking a swing at the newsroom culture that prizes speed and summary over insight, not at the possibility that factual writing can be art.
There is also a philosophical hierarchy at work. Mailer believed the novel could grasp a deeper human truth than daily news items and courtroom briefs. Surgeons and lawyers are bound to utility and rules; the novelist, in his self-conception, is bound to vision. Journalism, constrained by verification and institutional pressures yet lacking the prestige of life-or-death consequences, becomes the soft middle. The line exposes a rivalry over who gets to define truth and who earns cultural authority for doing so.
Read against later triumphs of investigative reporting and war correspondence, the sneer looks both provocative and deliberately unfair. That tension is the point. Mailer goads his audience to defend journalism by demanding more of it, just as he demanded that his own reportage aspire to the ambitions of the novel.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|
More Quotes by Norman
Add to List
