"If I lose, I lose. I'll do it on my terms"
About this Quote
The line declares a stubborn allegiance to agency over outcome. It accepts the possibility of failure without surrendering the right to choose how to act. That stance is more than bravado; it is a philosophy of leadership that prioritizes integrity, clarity of purpose, and self-respect over the tactical contortions meant to guarantee victory. Losing is framed as an acceptable cost, while ceding control of ones principles or message is not.
Ed Rendell built his political identity as a blunt, pragmatic reformer, from his years as Philadelphia mayor to his tenure as Pennsylvania governor and later as a party leader. He often argued that governing well requires doing hard things that may be unpopular in the short term: raising revenue for schools and infrastructure, confronting entrenched interests, telling voters what they do not want to hear. The statement fits that posture. Polls, consultants, and donors push candidates toward risk aversion and triangulation; Rendell understood that such caution can drain a campaign of authenticity and a government of the mandate needed to accomplish anything real.
There is also a tactical intelligence beneath the defiance. Voters recognize conviction, and even when they disagree, they often reward consistency and courage. Running or governing on ones terms can energize supporters, simplify messaging, and build credibility that survives setbacks. The approach carries hazards, of course. Sticking to ones terms can shade into stubbornness, and it assumes a leader has earned enough trust to withstand short-term backlash. But the alternative is a Pyrrhic victory: winning power at the price of the freedom to use it meaningfully.
The words echo a Stoic detachment from outcomes: control what you can control, accept what you cannot, and do not trade your judgment for a promise of safety. In politics, as in life, the terms of the effort shape the worth of the result.
Ed Rendell built his political identity as a blunt, pragmatic reformer, from his years as Philadelphia mayor to his tenure as Pennsylvania governor and later as a party leader. He often argued that governing well requires doing hard things that may be unpopular in the short term: raising revenue for schools and infrastructure, confronting entrenched interests, telling voters what they do not want to hear. The statement fits that posture. Polls, consultants, and donors push candidates toward risk aversion and triangulation; Rendell understood that such caution can drain a campaign of authenticity and a government of the mandate needed to accomplish anything real.
There is also a tactical intelligence beneath the defiance. Voters recognize conviction, and even when they disagree, they often reward consistency and courage. Running or governing on ones terms can energize supporters, simplify messaging, and build credibility that survives setbacks. The approach carries hazards, of course. Sticking to ones terms can shade into stubbornness, and it assumes a leader has earned enough trust to withstand short-term backlash. But the alternative is a Pyrrhic victory: winning power at the price of the freedom to use it meaningfully.
The words echo a Stoic detachment from outcomes: control what you can control, accept what you cannot, and do not trade your judgment for a promise of safety. In politics, as in life, the terms of the effort shape the worth of the result.
Quote Details
| Topic | Motivational |
|---|
More Quotes by Ed
Add to List
