"If I talk about Charles Dance I am talking about something else, something I operate and wind up and have to make an impression with and use to transmit someone else's screenplay"

Charles Dance, a recognized star known for his commanding screen existence and adaptability, offers a reflective commentary on the nature of his profession with the quote: "If I discuss Charles Dance I am speaking about something else, something I operate and end up and need to make an impression with and use to transfer somebody else's movie script". This declaration exposes a deep understanding of the duality inherent in the craft of acting, where the personal identity of the star stands out from the expert exterior they present in their roles.

Dance begins by suggesting the complexity of discussing his personality in conjunction with his work. When he refers to "something else", he means the idea that the person audiences see on screen is not totally associated with his personal self. Stars, by necessity, create and embody versions of themselves that serve the story they are charged with transmitting, effectively ending up being a vessel for the screenplay. This difference is vital in understanding how stars engage with their craft-- they must preserve a separation in between their personal identity and the characters they portray.

The concept of operating and ending up suggests a mechanistic or performative aspect to acting. Dance acknowledges his function as an interpreter of another person's writing, indicating that an actor's task is to breathe life into words and circumstances penned by film writers. This process needs ability, intuition, and the ability to communicate emotions that resonate with audiences, all while remaining genuine to the script's objectives.

Additionally, Dance acknowledges the obligation to make a strong impression. Success in acting hinges on the star's capability to leave an unforgettable impact, to resonate emotionally and intellectually with the audience, successfully bridging the space between written text and visual expression.

In conclusion, Charles Dance eloquently dissects the star's role as one of dual existence-- being both the human behind the efficiency and the crafted entity dedicated to storytelling. This insight highlights the actor's task as not just an individual journey, but a collective, interpretative, and technical endeavor that extends far beyond the self.