"If it were up to the candidates for president on the Republican side, we would be driving foreign cars. They would have let the auto industry in America go down the tubes"

Debbie Wasserman Schultz's quote addresses the economic and political landscape surrounding the American automobile market, especially in the context of presidential prospects' positions within the Republican Celebration. At the heart of her message is a critique of what she perceives as the Republican politician candidates' absence of support for domestic automobile manufacturers throughout a period of monetary distress.

Firstly, Wasserman Schultz implies that Republican candidates were either indifferent to or actively helpful of policies that might hurt the American automobile market. By recommending that "we would be driving foreign automobiles", she paints a photo where a damaged domestic market would result in increased reliance on foreign automobile imports. This images highlights a fear of losing crucial American manufacturing jobs and the potential erosion of a crucial sector of the U.S. economy. It also interest nationalistic sentiments, emphasizing the value of sustaining American markets.

In addition, "let the car industry in America decrease televisions" recommends that the prospects were either proposing or supporting economic policies that would lead to the decline or failure of the industry. This part of the declaration likely alludes to the opposition some Republican figures needed to government interventions, such as the 2008-2009 auto industry bailout, which was a contentious subject. Wasserman Schultz seems arguing that such opposition would have dire consequences for the American labor force and economy.

The quote utilizes hyperbolic language intended to provoke issue among the audience. By framing the problem as an option in between supporting American tasks and industries versus preferring foreign competitors, she seeks to position her own party's policies as protective of American economic interests. Eventually, it works as both a criticism of the Republican approach to economic policy and a wider commentary on the importance of thoughtful intervention to sustain crucial industries.