"If people would know how little brain is ruling the world, they would die of fear"

Ivo Andric's quote, "If people would understand how little brain is ruling the world, they would die of worry", recommends a profound hesitation towards the proficiency and intelligence of those in positions of power and impact. The expression "little brain" indicates a shortage in wisdom, insight, or maybe moral intelligence amongst leaders and decision-makers. Andric is most likely critiquing the tremendous effect that individuals with minimal understanding can have when governing countries, corporations, or other effective institutions.

This quote shows a broader issue about the detach between those who wield power and the average resident. The idea that the world is governed by individuals who might not be fully capable or qualified can be disturbing. It raises concerns about how decisions are made and whose interests are focused on. Andric's words may influence suspicion towards authority and a call for higher accountability and transparency amongst leaders.

Moreover, the notion that individuals would "pass away of worry" if they realized the fact recommends a prospective underestimation by the public about the complexities and enormities at stake in worldwide governance. It means a collective cognitive harshness, where people either consciously or automatically prefer lack of knowledge or rejection over facing uncomfortable facts about their leaders' restrictions.

This quote can be viewed as a call to action for greater public engagement and analysis over who is picked to lead. It argues for the necessity of notified and judicious choice processes in democratic societies to avoid inexperienced or misdirected people from rising to power.

In broader philosophical terms, Andric's observation resonates with the concept that human fallibility is a recurring challenge in the quest for just and reliable governance. It underscores the importance of watchfulness, education, and the active involvement of residents in securing the wellness of society versus the inadequacies of its leaders.