"If the large power voluntarily abstains from using its full power or feels the strategic situation to be such that it cannot do so, it in effect loses the advantage of being a big power"

Elliot Richardson's quote touches upon the complex characteristics of power in global relations, particularly worrying large or dominant powers. In essence, Richardson is checking out the intrinsic paradox dealt with by large powers when they choose not to exercise their complete capabilities or tactical benefits. This situation can undermine the very status that specifies them as "big powers."

Firstly, when a significant power abstains from using its full potential, it voluntarily limits its impact in international affairs. This restraint might come from ethical considerations, diplomatic methods, or an attempt to keep global stability. However, such a technique can lead to a self-imposed constraint that wears down the perception of power. In international relations, understanding affects habits and outcomes considerably. Thus, a large power knowingly selecting not to wield its full toolbox might inadvertently reduce its stature and influence on the international phase.

In addition, Richardson discuss the strategic context which may require a power to refrain from using its capabilities. This could occur due to shifting alliances, emerging dangers, or international public opinion that constrains a power's actions. In such cases, despite having substantial power, a nation might find itself in a position where releasing this power could be counter-productive, either intensifying conflicts or harming its long-lasting strategic interests. Therefore, the inability to fully exercise power due to strategic considerations recommends a loss of autonomy, which is a vital element of sovereign power.

An example can be seen in the Cold War context, in which nuclear-armed states regularly exercised restraint to prevent mutually assured damage. Such restraint, while necessary, also showed the restriction of a superpower's capability to act unilaterally without catastrophic repercussions.

Eventually, Richardson's quote encapsulates the paradox that in certain contexts, the tactical and voluntary restraint needed of being a large power might cause an erosion of the very advantages that specify their supremacy. This produces a nuanced interplay between power, understanding, and strategic necessity in forming the international order.