"If the triangles made a god, they would give him three sides"
About this Quote
Montesquieu slips a razor into a nursery-simple image: even geometry would anthropomorphize the divine in its own likeness. The line is funny because it’s so literal-minded. Triangles, earnest little creatures, can’t help but manufacture a god with three sides. Then the joke curdles into a critique of how humans build theology: not by discovering a cosmic truth, but by projecting familiar shapes, desires, and social arrangements onto the heavens.
The subtext is an Enlightenment demolition of “natural” religious certainty. Montesquieu isn’t just mocking superstition; he’s warning that our most confident metaphysics are often dressed-up self-portraits. If triangles could theologize, their god wouldn’t be omnipotent or benevolent by necessity; he’d be triangular because that’s what counts as complete, coherent, and beautiful in their world. Replace triangles with a monarchy, a mercantile class, or a church hierarchy, and the point sharpens: institutions tend to baptize their own structure as divine design.
Context matters. Montesquieu writes in a Europe still navigating the aftershocks of religious wars and the power of established churches, while Enlightenment thinkers probe belief with the new prestige of reason. The quote works as a compact argument for intellectual humility: if even an abstract shape would mistake its limits for reality, what are the odds humans escape the same trap? It’s less atheism than a demand for skepticism about our motives when we claim to speak for God.
The subtext is an Enlightenment demolition of “natural” religious certainty. Montesquieu isn’t just mocking superstition; he’s warning that our most confident metaphysics are often dressed-up self-portraits. If triangles could theologize, their god wouldn’t be omnipotent or benevolent by necessity; he’d be triangular because that’s what counts as complete, coherent, and beautiful in their world. Replace triangles with a monarchy, a mercantile class, or a church hierarchy, and the point sharpens: institutions tend to baptize their own structure as divine design.
Context matters. Montesquieu writes in a Europe still navigating the aftershocks of religious wars and the power of established churches, while Enlightenment thinkers probe belief with the new prestige of reason. The quote works as a compact argument for intellectual humility: if even an abstract shape would mistake its limits for reality, what are the odds humans escape the same trap? It’s less atheism than a demand for skepticism about our motives when we claim to speak for God.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Unverified source: Lettres persanes (Persian Letters) (Charles de Montesquieu, 1721)
Evidence: Letter 59 (Rica to Usbek); in some English eds. numbered Letter 57. Primary-source locus is the French text of Montesquieu’s epistolary novel. Letter 59 contains: “On a dit fort bien que, si les triangles faisoient un dieu, ils lui donneroient trois côtés.” The English quote (“If the triangles ma... Other candidates (2) THE VAGARIES OF SWING (Footprints on the Margate Sands of... (Mac Carty, 2013) compilation95.0% ... If the triangles made a God, they would give him three sides”. Charles de Montesquieu What on earth did Montesqui... Baruch Spinoza (Charles de Montesquieu) compilation41.3% as greater than what the rabbis stood for they should have used their exceptiona |
More Quotes by Charles
Add to List









