"If the United States were to cut and run from Iraq, we would send a message of weakness that would embolden our terrorist enemies across the globe. A failed Iraq would destabilize the entire region and undermine U.S. national security for decades to come"

Dennis Cardoza's statement is a reflection of the geopolitical and security concerns throughout the Iraq War, particularly from the perspective of those who supported sustained U.S. military engagement in the region. The expression "cut and run" suggests a premature or abrupt withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq, which Cardoza argues would predict an image of weakness. This perceived weakness, according to Cardoza, might push terrorist groups worldwide by indicating that the U.S. does not have the resolve to translucent its military and political objectives.

Cardoza's assertion rests on the property that terrorists and extremist groups might interpret such a withdrawal as a triumph versus one of the world's superpowers, possibly motivating further acts of terrorism and destabilizing efforts not only in Iraq however also internationally. By stating this, Cardoza underscores the belief that maintaining a strong military presence in Iraq was vital to deter foes and stabilize the region.

He even more argues that a "stopped working Iraq" might result in broader regional instability. This concept is rooted in the fear that Iraq's collapse may lead to a power vacuum, possibly resulting in civil war, local competitions, and the expansion of extremist ideologies. Such instability might have ripple effects, affecting neighboring nations and potentially resulting in increased terrorism and refugee crises, which in turn might challenge international security dynamics.

Additionally, Cardoza discusses the implications for U.S. national security, suggesting that the repercussions of a rash withdrawal could undermine American impact and security interests in the Middle East for decades. The implication is that a steady Iraq is vital for long-lasting U.S. tactical objectives in the region, including the containment of hostile programs, protecting energy resources, and supporting allied countries.

Overall, Cardoza's quote shows the arguments for ongoing military dedication in Iraq, highlighting the possible worldwide effects of withdrawal and framing the U.S. presence as a bulwark versus terrorism and regional instability.