"If we're so cruel to minorities, why do they keep coming here? Why aren't they sneaking across the Mexican border to make their way to the Taliban?"

Ann Coulter’s rhetorical question challenges the narrative that America is systemically cruel to minorities by pointing to ongoing immigration into the United States, particularly when compared to countries like those under Taliban rule. The implication is that the significant and persistent flow of immigrants, many of whom belong to minority groups, signals the United States remains fundamentally more appealing and humane than more oppressive regimes elsewhere in the world. By contrasting the United States with Taliban-controlled regions, she suggests the notion of America as exceptionally cruel is exaggerated, if not outright unfounded.

The phrase contains elements of irony and provocation. Coulter frames her argument through a hypothetical: if the U.S. were truly so inhospitable or brutal to minorities, logic would dictate that those minorities would avoid America or prefer even the harshest alternatives, such as Taliban rule, known for its extreme repression and human rights abuses. The reference to “sneaking across the Mexican border to make their way to the Taliban” is a pointed exaggeration, intended to highlight the perceived absurdity of accusations against American society.

Her statement assumes that migration patterns alone can be used as a metric for judging a country’s treatment of minorities. This is a contentious premise, as many factors influence migration: economic opportunity, safety from violence, family reunification, and the reputational legacy of the United States as a land of opportunity all play a role. Moreover, critics may argue that the appeal of the U.S. compared to more overtly repressive countries does not necessarily invalidate genuine grievances about racism or systemic inequality within America itself.

The quote is both a defense of American society and a criticism of what the speaker views as hyperbolic or opportunistic narratives regarding racism and cruelty in the United States. It uses stark, provocative contrasts as a rhetorical device to question accusations levied at the U.S., inviting readers to reconsider their premises about migration and social justice.