"If you can do it then why do it?"
About this Quote
Gertrude Stein compresses a bracing challenge into a paradox: If you can do it then why do it? The surface sense is perverse, yet it opens a rich field of inquiry about motivation, creativity, and habit. The conditional if you can frames ability as a kind of trap; once something is already within reach, the act risks becoming rote, utilitarian, or derivative. Why do it, then, becomes a spur to seek what has not yet been imagined, to refuse complacency and repetition.
Stein built her artistic life on that refusal. As a central modernist figure in Paris, she broke narrative, fractured syntax, and treated language as material rather than transparent conduit. The line enacts her method: simple words, repeated, turn back on themselves, forcing attention to texture and rhythm. Can and do seem straightforward, but placed in this arrangement they expose a hidden economy of value. Achievement measured by feasibility or productivity is not the same as discovery. The artist, and perhaps any thinker, should be drawn to what resists existing skill, to problems that force new forms of seeing and saying.
There is also a philosophical sting. Why suggests that capacity alone does not confer justification. To act just because one can is a weak reason. The line invites a criterion beyond mere possibility: necessity, beauty, risk, transformation. It undermines the cult of competence and the prestige of the finished task, emphasizing process, experiment, and the unknown. In everyday life, it nudges against autopilot. When the answer to why is just because it is easy, stop and ask what calls for deeper attention.
Taken as a koan of modernism, the sentence is both playful and severe. It invites an ethic of difficulty, not for its own sake, but because difficulty is where meaning often hides. Do the thing you cannot yet do, and in doing it become someone who can.
Stein built her artistic life on that refusal. As a central modernist figure in Paris, she broke narrative, fractured syntax, and treated language as material rather than transparent conduit. The line enacts her method: simple words, repeated, turn back on themselves, forcing attention to texture and rhythm. Can and do seem straightforward, but placed in this arrangement they expose a hidden economy of value. Achievement measured by feasibility or productivity is not the same as discovery. The artist, and perhaps any thinker, should be drawn to what resists existing skill, to problems that force new forms of seeing and saying.
There is also a philosophical sting. Why suggests that capacity alone does not confer justification. To act just because one can is a weak reason. The line invites a criterion beyond mere possibility: necessity, beauty, risk, transformation. It undermines the cult of competence and the prestige of the finished task, emphasizing process, experiment, and the unknown. In everyday life, it nudges against autopilot. When the answer to why is just because it is easy, stop and ask what calls for deeper attention.
Taken as a koan of modernism, the sentence is both playful and severe. It invites an ethic of difficulty, not for its own sake, but because difficulty is where meaning often hides. Do the thing you cannot yet do, and in doing it become someone who can.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|
More Quotes by Gertrude
Add to List
