"I'll bet Shakespeare compromised himself a lot; anybody who's in the entertainment industry does to some extent"

In Christopher Isherwood's quote, "I'll wager Shakespeare compromised himself a lot; any person who's in the entertainment industry does to some extent", he brings forth an insight about the typically hidden, yet widespread truth of innovative compromise that exists within the show business. This reflection suggests that even the icons and apotheosis of literary and creative excellence, like William Shakespeare, had to browse the precarious balance between creative integrity and the commercial or social needs of their time.

Isherwood suggests that compromise is not just an incidental part of the creative process however rather an intrinsic element of working within any home entertainment structure, which is inherently affected by public taste, market demands, and political climates. Shakespeare, often revered as an epitome of creative genius, run within the Elizabethan age's social, political, and commercial constraints, which possibly necessitated concessions in his writing.

For example, Shakespeare's choice to write plays that catered to the tastes and preferences of the monarchy and subjects of his era might be viewed as a form of compromise, allowing him to keep favor and monetary stability. The playwright's addition of particular styles, comical aspects, or flattering representations of emperors might not solely be a creative option but a strategic choice affected by external pressures.

Isherwood's quote suggests that this dynamic of compromise is not a deficiency special to any one artist or era, but rather a seasonal part of the entertainment industry. Whether it refers to negotiating the stress in between imaginative vision and commercial viability or aligning art with societal norms to ensure acceptance and success, such compromise is illustrated as an inevitable facet of truth for artists.

Through acknowledging this, Isherwood welcomes reflection on how these compromises shape art and its reception, prompting a much deeper understanding of the forces that mold imaginative expressions, both historically with figures like Shakespeare and in modern contexts. The recommendation of compromise does not reduce artistic value but rather enhances our appreciation of the intricacies dealt with by creators in bringing their art to fulfillment.