"I'm not so funny. Gilda was funny. I'm funny on camera sometimes. In life, once in a while. Once in a while. But she was funny. She spent more time worrying about being liked than anything else"
About this Quote
Gene Wilder's reflection catches a deep, reflective recommendation of the distinction between viewed humor and inherent comical talent. His declaration begins with a simple admission: "I'm not so amusing". This self-assessment highlights Wilder's own perception of his comical abilities compared to those around him, particularly Gilda Radner, whom he straight contrasts with himself. The difference he makes is in between the sporadic nature of his own funny--"I'm amusing on electronic camera often. In life, once in a while"-- and the inherent, constant humor he attributes to Radner. Wilder credits Gilda with being truly amusing, a characteristic that seems to flow naturally in every element of her life, not simply in specific scenarios or efficiencies.
Radner, a renowned comic and among the original cast members of "Saturday Night Live", was renowned for her vibrant characters and comedic genius. Wilder's adoration for her appears in his repetition and focus: "But she was funny". This adoration likewise exposes a vulnerability in Wilder as he acknowledges his perception of comedic disparity between them. By duplicating "from time to time", he underscores his belief that his own humor is rare and not as naturally happening as Radner's.
Nevertheless, Wilder's reflection likewise reveals a more profound insight into Radner's character and possibly a common characteristic amongst comedians: sensitivity about acceptance and likeability. "She invested more time stressing over resembling than anything else" suggests that, regardless of Radner's comedic gifts, she was deeply worried about how she was viewed by others. This remark opens a window into the frequently surprise insecurities of entertainers, who-- despite their ability to stimulate laughter and joy-- may face insecurity and the desire for approval. Wilder's thoughtful distinction in between on-screen personality and real-life personality catches the intricacy of comedic artistry and the typically tangled relationship in between public success and personal vulnerability.
More details
About the Author