"In order to be successful against each of these threats, we have to have a presence overseas, work closely not only with our counterparts in the law enforcement community, but also with the intelligence community"
About this Quote
Security, in Mueller's telling, is a supply chain: upstream collection abroad, downstream enforcement at home. The line is built like a bureaucratic syllogism, but its real force is political. "Each of these threats" is a catch-all that invites the listener to fill in the blanks with whatever scares them most - terrorism, organized crime, cyberattacks - and then accept the proposed cure as common sense. The vagueness is the point: it widens the mandate without naming the trade-offs.
The phrase "presence overseas" does quiet but heavy work. It's not just about stationing agents or liaising with allies; it's a permission structure for extraterritorial reach, surveillance partnerships, and the kind of preemption that became doctrine in the post-9/11 era. By framing it as necessity ("have to"), Mueller shifts the argument from policy choice to operational requirement, a move that tends to shut down democratic friction.
Then comes the institutional bridge: law enforcement plus intelligence. Mueller is signaling a post-wall architecture where evidence and information flow across boundaries that once existed to protect civil liberties and prevent politicized policing. The subtext is reassurance - coordination equals competence - while sidestepping the anxiety many Americans carry about exactly that fusion: secret methods feeding public prosecutions, classified tips shaping who gets watched, and accountability diffusing across agencies.
As a public servant, Mueller's intent reads less like chest-thumping and more like managerial persuasion. It's the language of someone normalizing an expanded security state by presenting it as mere professionalism: collaboration, counterpartship, community. The rhetoric is calm; the implications are not.
The phrase "presence overseas" does quiet but heavy work. It's not just about stationing agents or liaising with allies; it's a permission structure for extraterritorial reach, surveillance partnerships, and the kind of preemption that became doctrine in the post-9/11 era. By framing it as necessity ("have to"), Mueller shifts the argument from policy choice to operational requirement, a move that tends to shut down democratic friction.
Then comes the institutional bridge: law enforcement plus intelligence. Mueller is signaling a post-wall architecture where evidence and information flow across boundaries that once existed to protect civil liberties and prevent politicized policing. The subtext is reassurance - coordination equals competence - while sidestepping the anxiety many Americans carry about exactly that fusion: secret methods feeding public prosecutions, classified tips shaping who gets watched, and accountability diffusing across agencies.
As a public servant, Mueller's intent reads less like chest-thumping and more like managerial persuasion. It's the language of someone normalizing an expanded security state by presenting it as mere professionalism: collaboration, counterpartship, community. The rhetoric is calm; the implications are not.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List



