"In order to shake a hypothesis, it is sometimes not necessary to do anything more than push it as far as it will go"
About this Quote
Diderot’s line is a small grenade disguised as procedural advice: the surest way to break a bad idea is to let it have everything it asks for. “Push it as far as it will go” isn’t about brute-force skepticism; it’s about method. Take a hypothesis seriously enough to grant it its full logic, and you’ll often watch it trip over its own ambitions. The intent is surgical: don’t refute from the outside with moral outrage or authority; expose the internal contradictions by extending the claim to its natural endpoint.
The subtext is Enlightenment-era impatience with inherited certainties. Diderot, the editor-architect of the Encyclopedie, lived in a world where doctrine (religious, political, intellectual) protected itself by stopping inquiry early. His sentence insists that thinking should be allowed to run to term, even when it threatens respectable conclusions. It’s a defense of intellectual risk-taking: the hypothesis must be stress-tested, not politely admired.
There’s also a sly editorial credo embedded here. Editors don’t only cut; they amplify. When a writer’s argument is shaky, the most devastating critique can be to strengthen it, clarify it, make it consistent, then see what it demands. If the polished version still collapses, the failure is undeniable. Diderot frames critique as a kind of generosity: give the idea its best chance, and if it can’t survive its own implications, it doesn’t deserve the social power it’s trying to claim. That’s why the line still reads modern: it’s basically “follow the logic” as a weapon against fashionable nonsense and sanctified dogma alike.
The subtext is Enlightenment-era impatience with inherited certainties. Diderot, the editor-architect of the Encyclopedie, lived in a world where doctrine (religious, political, intellectual) protected itself by stopping inquiry early. His sentence insists that thinking should be allowed to run to term, even when it threatens respectable conclusions. It’s a defense of intellectual risk-taking: the hypothesis must be stress-tested, not politely admired.
There’s also a sly editorial credo embedded here. Editors don’t only cut; they amplify. When a writer’s argument is shaky, the most devastating critique can be to strengthen it, clarify it, make it consistent, then see what it demands. If the polished version still collapses, the failure is undeniable. Diderot frames critique as a kind of generosity: give the idea its best chance, and if it can’t survive its own implications, it doesn’t deserve the social power it’s trying to claim. That’s why the line still reads modern: it’s basically “follow the logic” as a weapon against fashionable nonsense and sanctified dogma alike.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Denis
Add to List



