"In Rwanda that genocide happened because the international community and the Security Council refused to give, again, another 5000 troops which would have cost, I don't know, maybe fifty, a hundred, million dollars"

The quote by Lakhdar Brahimi, a seasoned Algerian diplomat with comprehensive experience in international conflict resolution, reviews the tragic occasions of the Rwandan genocide in 1994, while slamming the international neighborhood for its inactiveness. The genocide, throughout which roughly 800,000 individuals were methodically eliminated throughout about 100 days, is frequently mentioned as a profound failure of the international community to avoid mass atrocities despite clear cautions and opportunities for intervention.

Brahimi specifically discusses the Security Council's refusal to send an additional 5,000 troops, recommending that such a force, with a reasonably modest monetary expense of "fifty, a hundred, million dollars", could have considerably altered the course of events. By highlighting the particular variety of troops and the estimated expense, Brahimi emphasizes the awful variation between the resources needed for possible intervention and the disastrous consequence of inaction. The suggestion is that the expense-- both in human and financial terms-- of releasing these soldiers would have been minimal compared to the enormous loss of life and suffering sustained.

This quote highlights a more comprehensive critique of the global community's propensity to focus on political or financial considerations over urgent humanitarian requirements. The recommendation to the failure to deploy soldiers indicate bureaucratic inertia and an absence of political will, where prospective action was stymied by indecision, geopolitical dynamics, or passiveness. For Brahimi, the reference of the Security Council emphasizes the crucial function that this body, with its required to keep international peace and security, stopped working to support during the crisis.

The moral weight of Brahimi's review extends beyond Rwanda, working as a cautionary reflection on the continuing need for timely global action and robust systems to avoid genocides and mass atrocities in other contexts. His words advise us of the pervasive and lasting effect that choices-- or indecisions-- at the global level can have on vulnerable populations captured in the throes of dispute and violence.