"In sum, as we enter the 21st century, the Euro-Atlantic community - North America and Europe together - has to face some tough challenges when it comes to improving our capability"
About this Quote
The phrase "Euro-Atlantic community" is doing heavy political lifting: it’s not just geography, it’s a claim about who counts as "we" in global security. Lord Robertson, speaking as a diplomat and NATO insider, is stitching North America and Europe into a single moral and strategic unit at precisely the moment that unity could no longer be taken for granted. The quote’s flat managerial tone - "in sum", "tough challenges", "improving our capability" - is itself a rhetorical tactic. It turns contested questions of power, spending, and military posture into the language of prudent housekeeping. That’s how you ask for more without sounding like you’re asking for more.
The subtext is burden-sharing and modernization. "Capability" is a deliberately elastic noun: it can mean troop readiness, intelligence-sharing, cyber defense, rapid deployment, interoperability, or simply higher defense budgets. By refusing to specify, Robertson avoids triggering domestic political landmines in member states while still signaling urgency. He’s building consensus by leaving room for each government to hear its own priorities in the same sentence.
Context matters: late 1990s/early 2000s NATO was rebranding after the Cold War, absorbing new members, responding to the Balkans, and anticipating a messier security environment where threats were diffuse and interventions were politically fraught. The intent isn’t inspirational; it’s architectural. Robertson is laying the groundwork for a 21st-century alliance narrative: unity as necessity, capability as credibility, and "community" as a polite way to say bloc.
The subtext is burden-sharing and modernization. "Capability" is a deliberately elastic noun: it can mean troop readiness, intelligence-sharing, cyber defense, rapid deployment, interoperability, or simply higher defense budgets. By refusing to specify, Robertson avoids triggering domestic political landmines in member states while still signaling urgency. He’s building consensus by leaving room for each government to hear its own priorities in the same sentence.
Context matters: late 1990s/early 2000s NATO was rebranding after the Cold War, absorbing new members, responding to the Balkans, and anticipating a messier security environment where threats were diffuse and interventions were politically fraught. The intent isn’t inspirational; it’s architectural. Robertson is laying the groundwork for a 21st-century alliance narrative: unity as necessity, capability as credibility, and "community" as a polite way to say bloc.
Quote Details
| Topic | Vision & Strategy |
|---|
More Quotes by Lord
Add to List
