"In war, there are no winners"
About this Quote
“In war, there are no winners” is the kind of sentence that tries to sandblast heroism off the word “war.” It’s blunt on purpose: no names, no flags, no qualifiers. That spareness is the strategy. By refusing to distinguish between “just” and “unjust” wars, or between victors and vanquished, Ramman Kenoun aims at the emotional infrastructure that makes wars feel narratively clean: the scoreboard mentality, the parade-ending, the history-book closure.
The intent reads less like policy analysis and more like a moral interruption. It’s designed to stop the listener mid-sentence when they start talking about gains, victories, or necessary costs. The subtext is that “winning” is a story states tell themselves to metabolize trauma. Even when a side achieves its objectives, the aftermath leaks: bodies, displacement, ruined civic trust, a generation trained to normalize violence. “No winners” also implies something more accusatory: that war’s benefits tend to be privatized (power, territory, contracts) while its damage is socialized.
Contextually, the line fits a modern, media-saturated era where war is sold in high-definition and summarized in maps, where distance makes violence feel abstract. Kenoun’s phrasing pushes back against that abstraction, insisting on war as a system that degrades everyone it touches, including the so-called victors. It works because it denies the audience the comfort of ending the story with triumph.
The intent reads less like policy analysis and more like a moral interruption. It’s designed to stop the listener mid-sentence when they start talking about gains, victories, or necessary costs. The subtext is that “winning” is a story states tell themselves to metabolize trauma. Even when a side achieves its objectives, the aftermath leaks: bodies, displacement, ruined civic trust, a generation trained to normalize violence. “No winners” also implies something more accusatory: that war’s benefits tend to be privatized (power, territory, contracts) while its damage is socialized.
Contextually, the line fits a modern, media-saturated era where war is sold in high-definition and summarized in maps, where distance makes violence feel abstract. Kenoun’s phrasing pushes back against that abstraction, insisting on war as a system that degrades everyone it touches, including the so-called victors. It works because it denies the audience the comfort of ending the story with triumph.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Ramman
Add to List








