"Intuition and concepts constitute... the elements of all our knowledge, so that neither concepts without an intuition in some way corresponding to them, nor intuition without concepts, can yield knowledge"
About this Quote
Kant is laying down a hard boundary line: your mind doesn’t get to call something “knowledge” unless raw experience and mental structure lock together. The quote works because it refuses two tempting shortcuts. First, the rationalist fantasy that pure concepts - neat definitions, logical systems, metaphysical categories - can float free of the world and still count as knowing. Second, the empiricist fantasy that a flood of sensations, untouched by interpretation, arrives already stamped with meaning. Kant’s punch is to insist that both are sterile alone: concepts without intuitions are empty; intuitions without concepts are blind.
The subtext is almost bureaucratic. Kant is policing the border checkpoint between thinking and knowing, issuing passports only when the paperwork matches the traveler. “In some way corresponding” does a lot of work: he’s not claiming that the world hands us concepts directly, but that concepts must be tethered to possible experience if they’re going to be legitimate. That’s the quiet anti-mysticism in his project; it’s also an anti-dogmatism aimed at philosophers who build castles in the air.
Context matters: this is the Critique of Pure Reason era, where Kant tries to rescue science from skepticism without granting metaphysics a blank check. He wants Newtonian physics to look secure while explaining why traditional metaphysical claims (souls, God, the cosmos as a totality) so often overreach. The intent isn’t to shrink human reason, but to give it a disciplined job description: we don’t merely record reality, and we don’t merely invent it. We synthesize it.
The subtext is almost bureaucratic. Kant is policing the border checkpoint between thinking and knowing, issuing passports only when the paperwork matches the traveler. “In some way corresponding” does a lot of work: he’s not claiming that the world hands us concepts directly, but that concepts must be tethered to possible experience if they’re going to be legitimate. That’s the quiet anti-mysticism in his project; it’s also an anti-dogmatism aimed at philosophers who build castles in the air.
Context matters: this is the Critique of Pure Reason era, where Kant tries to rescue science from skepticism without granting metaphysics a blank check. He wants Newtonian physics to look secure while explaining why traditional metaphysical claims (souls, God, the cosmos as a totality) so often overreach. The intent isn’t to shrink human reason, but to give it a disciplined job description: we don’t merely record reality, and we don’t merely invent it. We synthesize it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Knowledge |
|---|---|
| Source | Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason (Kritik der reinen Vernunft), 1781 (1st ed.)/1787 (2nd ed.); see A51/B75 — passage on intuitions and concepts as the elements of knowledge. |
More Quotes by Immanuel
Add to List





