"It doesn't matter who you vote for. It's still the same billionaires that run the world"

The quote by Geezer Butler, "It does not matter who you vote for. It's still the very same billionaires that run the world", conveys a sentiment of disillusionment with the political system and hesitation about the true power characteristics at play in society. At its core, the statement recommends that despite the democratic procedure and the act of voting, the overarching control and impact stay in the hands of a wealthy elite. This reflects a common criticism that political systems, especially in democracies, might not adequately represent the interests of the basic people but are instead disproportionately formed by powerful financial interests.

The expression "It doesn't matter who you elect" suggests a sense of futility and resignation worrying electoral choices. It suggests that despite which political celebration or prospect pertains to power, the dominant socio-economic structures do not move considerably. This can be translated as a critique of the propensity for mainstream political parties to have overlapping economic and foreign policy programs, typically shaped by lobbying and funding from significant corporations and rich people.

The latter part of the quote, "It's still the same billionaires that run the world", underscores the belief in the outsized power and influence of the super-rich. This view indicate the reality that considerable financial resources are focused in the hands of a small number of people, who consequently wield considerable sway over global economic policies, media narratives, and even governance. This concentration of power can cause policies that favor the interests of the upscale, perpetuating inequalities and restricting the effect of policies promoted by representatives of the bulk.

In general, Butler's quote encapsulates a vital perspective on the effectiveness of democracy in resolving the needs and concerns of daily citizens. It calls into question the stability and functionality of political systems that are susceptible to the influence of concentrated wealth, highlighting a growing concern about economic inequality and democratic disenchantment in contemporary society.