"It has become evident that the primary lesson of the study of evolution is that all evolution is coevolution: every organism is evolving in tandem with the organisms around it"
About this Quote
Kelly’s line is a quiet rebuke to the lone-genius mythology we love to paste onto nature and, by extension, onto innovation. By insisting that “all evolution is coevolution,” he punctures the comforting idea of a self-contained organism steadily “improving” on its own. Evolution, in this framing, isn’t a ladder; it’s a crowded dance floor where every step changes the music for everyone else.
The specific intent is partly scientific accuracy and partly worldview. Coevolution is a real biological dynamic (predators and prey, hosts and parasites, plants and pollinators), but Kelly’s phrasing pushes it into a broader cultural argument: adaptation is relational. “In tandem” is doing heavy rhetorical work here. It turns evolution from a competitive solo into a system-level process shaped by feedback loops, dependencies, and unintended consequences. It’s not just that organisms affect each other; it’s that their trajectories become entangled, so “fitness” is never purely internal. You survive because the environment includes other living strategies.
Context matters: Kelly, as a founding Wired editor and long-running technology thinker, is almost certainly smuggling a parallel claim about tech ecosystems. Platforms, users, regulations, markets, and norms co-evolve; no product “wins” in isolation. The subtext is a caution against simplistic narratives of progress and control. If everything evolves together, then every intervention (a new tool, policy, or cultural shift) also rewires the selective pressures around it. That’s both an argument for humility and a blueprint for thinking in networks rather than heroes.
The specific intent is partly scientific accuracy and partly worldview. Coevolution is a real biological dynamic (predators and prey, hosts and parasites, plants and pollinators), but Kelly’s phrasing pushes it into a broader cultural argument: adaptation is relational. “In tandem” is doing heavy rhetorical work here. It turns evolution from a competitive solo into a system-level process shaped by feedback loops, dependencies, and unintended consequences. It’s not just that organisms affect each other; it’s that their trajectories become entangled, so “fitness” is never purely internal. You survive because the environment includes other living strategies.
Context matters: Kelly, as a founding Wired editor and long-running technology thinker, is almost certainly smuggling a parallel claim about tech ecosystems. Platforms, users, regulations, markets, and norms co-evolve; no product “wins” in isolation. The subtext is a caution against simplistic narratives of progress and control. If everything evolves together, then every intervention (a new tool, policy, or cultural shift) also rewires the selective pressures around it. That’s both an argument for humility and a blueprint for thinking in networks rather than heroes.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Kevin
Add to List


