"It is difficult to understand these people who democratically take part in elections and a referendum, but are then incapable of democratically accepting the will of the people"

In this quote, Nobel Prize-winning Portuguese author José Saramago is revealing a review of what he perceives as a contradiction in democratic behavior. At its core, the declaration highlights a paradox often observed in democratic societies: the tension between participating in democratic processes and accepting their results.

Saramago is indicating the disparity of individuals or groups who actively take part in democratic practices, such as ballot in elections and referendums, yet struggle to accept or respect the choices that emerge from them. The quote reflects a wider conversation about the nature of democracy and the duties it involves. Participation in democratic elections suggests a desire to abide by the cumulative decision of the electorate, even when the result contrasts one's personal choices or interests.

Making use of the word "tough" recommends a sense of disappointment or confusion at this contradiction. Saramago may be implicitly questioning whether real democracy exists if its individuals can not reconcile themselves with its results. By highlighting this disparity, he welcomes reflection on the maturity and stability of a democracy where citizens selectively accept or reject electoral results.

This issue can be observed in numerous contemporary contexts, where sectors of the population contradict election outcomes, frequently leading to political unrest or instability. The undercurrent of Saramago's statement is a require democratic integrity-- a pointer that the legitimacy and functionality of a democracy depend not simply on participation, but also on the collective dedication to maintain its principles, including the acceptance of its results.

Ultimately, Saramago is promoting for a more profound understanding and regard for democratic procedures, suggesting that genuine democracy is not almost the act of voting, but also about embracing the shared consequences of those votes with dignity and respect for the collective will.