"It seems as though there are Members in this body who want to filibuster just about everything we try to do, whether it is stopping judicial nominations, the Energy bill, or this Medicare bill"

In the quote by Jim Bunning, a previous U.S. Senator, he comments on making use of filibustering in the legal procedure. Filibustering describes a parliamentary treatment where one or more members of a legislature extend debate on a proposed piece of legislation to postpone or entirely avoid a choice from being made on the proposal. Bunning's declaration recommends a level of disappointment and highlights the obstructionist techniques employed by some members within the legislative body.

The phrase "Members in this body" most likely refers to fellow senators in the U.S. Senate. Bunning's usage of "just about whatever we attempt to do" underscores his understanding that the filibuster is being excessive used for a wide variety of legislative matters, possibly preventing productive discourse and decision-making. He identifies several specific areas-- "judicial elections, the Energy bill, or this Medicare costs"-- suggesting that the technique is applied to both administrative and policy-oriented concerns.

His mention of "stopping judicial elections" is considerable, as judicial appointments are crucial for forming the judiciary's future and can have lasting impacts on a country's legal landscape. Utilizing a filibuster to block these nominations suggests a tactical move to affect the ideological balance of the courts.

The referral to the "Energy costs" indicates legislation vital for energy policy, which might include matters relating to sustainability, nationwide energy strategy, and addressing climate modification. Such legislation is typically complicated and can deeply affect national and global economies and environments.

Last but not least, "this Medicare costs" mentions ongoing disputes and legislative maneuvers surrounding healthcare reform, specifically Medicare, which is a federal program that offers health protection to seniors and particular disabled individuals. Debate in this location is typically extremely contentious, offered its monetary implications and effect on public well-being.

In general, Bunning's quote communicates a sense of exasperation with legal gridlock, implicitly arguing that excessive filibustering could undermine practical governance and delay critical governmental and social progress.