"It would seem, therefore, that this constitutional safeguard may no longer serve its original purpose, especially when, as we learned last year, some acts of perjury may now be acceptable - in this world, at least, if not the next"
- James L. Buckley
About this Quote
James L. Buckley's quote invites readers to reflect on the integrity and efficacy of constitutional safeguards, particularly in relation to truthfulness and accountability. The expression suggests a critical assessment of how such safeguards may have deteriorated or lost their initial function gradually. Buckley implies that the fundamental principles suggested to secure and uphold truth within legal and governmental institutions are being jeopardized.
The recommendation to "some acts of perjury may now be acceptable" highlights a troubling trend where the intentional act of lying under oath, typically a grave offense, is becoming stabilized or ignored in modern society. This raises concerns about the ability of legal systems to administer justice impartially and maintain ethical standards. It also questions the moral material of institutions responsible for making pivotal social decisions.
Buckley's usage of "in this world, a minimum of, if not the next" introduces a spiritual or ethical dichotomy, contrasting earthly justice with a higher, possibly divine, basic of morality. This juxtaposition underscores a viewed decrease in moral responsibility within nonreligious organizations, suggesting that while specific actions might escape repercussions in this life, they may not be as easily ignored in a moral or spiritual reckoning.
Ultimately, Buckley challenges audiences to reconsider the effectiveness and stability of present legal and constitutional mechanisms in keeping truth and moral accountability. It works as a call to action for people and legislators alike to re-evaluate and enhance these safeguards to guarantee they serve their desired function. In doing so, society can aim to line up more closely with the concepts of justice and reality that underpin democratic governance and ethical conduct.
About the Author