"It's not that the film is violent, it's that people have an issue with violence right now"

In the quote, "It's not that the film is violent, it's that people have an issue with violence right now", star Thomas Jane hints at the complex relationship in between media, societal norms, and public perception. At surface area level, Jane's statement appears to absolve movies from obligation by recommending that it's the audience's level of sensitivity or current social environment that problematizes the depiction of violence, rather than the material of the film itself.

A deeper interpretation may think about how social culture and media show one another. Films frequently work as a mirror to cultural fears, anxieties, or problems. For that reason, an audience's heightened level of sensitivity to violence in media might show a broader societal issue towards real-world violence. This implies that objections aren't necessarily about fictional representations themselves, but rather about the perceived universality and impact of violence in society at big.

Jane's comment could likewise be viewed as a defense of poetic license and an argument versus censorship. Film, like any art kind, seeks to check out the human condition in its whole, which includes darker elements like violence. For that reason, filmmakers may argue that their artistic intent isn't to glorify violence, but to illustrate it in a manner that provokes idea or emotion.

Nevertheless, Jane's assertion might be critiqued for potentially dismissing genuine critiques relating to the effect of violent media. Issues about the glorification of violence and its desensitizing effects on viewers are longstanding, with many studies and debates surrounding media violence's influence on behavior. Therefore, while Jane stresses societal disposition as the issue, critics would argue that creators have a responsibility in shaping this really personality.

Ultimately, Jane's quote calls for a nuanced discussion about media, violence, and societal worths. It highlights the continuous settlement in between developers' creative expressions and audiences' analyses and sensitivities, inviting both filmmakers and audiences to reflect on how they digest and respond to representations of violence.