"I've done that kind of stuff in records, where you start going back and you want to just redo everything, destroy everything, because you think it all sucks and you can do it better"
About this Quote
Spektor is naming the most seductive trap in the studio: the fantasy that a finished record can be rewound into a cleaner, truer version of yourself. The line tumbles forward in run-on panic, mirroring the spiral it describes - you listen, you cringe, you imagine a better take, and suddenly “redo everything” becomes less an artistic choice than an emotional compulsion. “Destroy everything” isn’t just hyperbole; it’s the small violence of perfectionism, the urge to erase evidence of earlier limits and moods.
The intent reads like a confession offered to fellow makers: she’s demystifying the idea that art arrives as a pristine transmission. Instead, it’s a document of a specific day’s voice, nerves, energy, and available tools. The subtext is insecurity, sure, but also control. In recorded music, you can theoretically sand down every rough edge, and that possibility breeds a kind of self-surveillance: not just “is this good?” but “does this prove I’m good?”
Context matters because Spektor’s appeal has always included the human seams - the theatrical phrasing, the intimate weirdness, the sense that the song is alive and slightly uncontainable. Her quote quietly defends that messiness. The moment you “go back” too much, you risk editing out the very accidents that make a track feel inhabited. It’s also a snapshot of modern production culture, where endless revisions are technologically easy and psychologically brutal. Spektor pushes back by admitting the impulse, then exposing its absurd endpoint: a masterpiece you can chase forever, at the cost of the thing that made you press record in the first place.
The intent reads like a confession offered to fellow makers: she’s demystifying the idea that art arrives as a pristine transmission. Instead, it’s a document of a specific day’s voice, nerves, energy, and available tools. The subtext is insecurity, sure, but also control. In recorded music, you can theoretically sand down every rough edge, and that possibility breeds a kind of self-surveillance: not just “is this good?” but “does this prove I’m good?”
Context matters because Spektor’s appeal has always included the human seams - the theatrical phrasing, the intimate weirdness, the sense that the song is alive and slightly uncontainable. Her quote quietly defends that messiness. The moment you “go back” too much, you risk editing out the very accidents that make a track feel inhabited. It’s also a snapshot of modern production culture, where endless revisions are technologically easy and psychologically brutal. Spektor pushes back by admitting the impulse, then exposing its absurd endpoint: a masterpiece you can chase forever, at the cost of the thing that made you press record in the first place.
Quote Details
| Topic | Music |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Regina
Add to List




