"Land in Hawaii is money. What I'm talking about here is ceded land - land that belonged to the kingdom and was ceded to the republic and then to the state when we achieved statehood"

Neil Abercrombie's quote highlights the complex historical and modern issues surrounding land ownership in Hawaii, with specific concentrate on what is described as "ceded land". To fully analyze this, we must explore the historical and socio-political context of Hawaii's land.

The term "delivered land" describes the land that was originally owned by the Hawaiian Kingdom however was consequently transferred to the Republic of Hawaii following the topple of the monarchy in 1893. This land was later on turned over to the United States when Hawaii ended up being a U.S. area and eventually to the state of Hawaii when it achieved statehood in 1959.

Abercrombie's assertion that "land in Hawaii is cash" underscores the tremendous worth and economic significance of land in the islands. Hawaii's economy is heavily dependent on property, tourism, and farming, all of which are thoroughly tied to land ownership and usage. Therefore, land in Hawaii is not just a physical area however a vital resource that holds substantial monetary value.

The passage shows the controversial nature of ceded lands and the continuous disputes about home rights and privileges, particularly in relation to Native Hawaiians. Lots of Native Hawaiians view the transfer of these lands to the United States and later on to the state as illegitimate, given that it followed a duration of substantial upheaval and disenfranchisement for the indigenous population. As a result, there have been longstanding needs for the return of these lands to Native Hawaiian governance, or a minimum of for the resources derived from them to benefit Native Hawaiian neighborhoods.

The quote implicitly raises concerns about justice, reparations, and self-determination for Native Hawaiians. Abercrombie, by emphasizing the transition of these lands from the kingdom to republic, and then the state, is highlighting the historical layers of ownership and the resulting legal and moral intricacies. The topic stays a poignant symbol of the wider struggle for Native Hawaiian rights and the sustainable stewardship of Hawaii's natural resources.