"Liberal democracy - as you know, in the old days, we were saying we want socialism with a human face. Today's left effectively offers global capitalism with a human face, more tolerance, more rights and so on. So the question is, is this enough or not? Here I remain a Marxist: I think not"
About this Quote
Zizek’s provocation lands because it flips the self-congratulatory story liberal democracies like to tell about themselves: that history bent toward decency, rights, and “tolerance,” and the rest is just fine-tuning. He takes the once-utopian slogan “socialism with a human face” and turns it into an indictment of the contemporary center-left: a politics that has given up on transforming the economic engine and now sells itself as capitalism’s kinder, more diverse customer-service department.
The intent is less nostalgia for 20th-century socialism than a jab at the left’s narrowed imagination. “Global capitalism with a human face” is an intentionally ugly phrase, because it exposes how moral language can become a branding layer. Rights, representation, and procedural safeguards matter, he grants that. But the subtext is that these achievements increasingly operate as compensation for a deeper surrender: accepting the market as the only real horizon, and treating redistribution, public ownership, or decommodification as either naive or impolite.
Context matters here. Zizek is speaking from the post-1989 wreckage where socialist projects collapsed, liberal democracy declared victory, and the “Third Way” taught progressive parties to manage globalization rather than confront it. His Marxist “not enough” is a structural claim: tolerance can coexist with precarity; expanded rights can sit atop privatized essentials; inclusion can happen inside an economy that still produces exclusion as a feature, not a bug. The line works because it refuses the comforting trade: you get dignity, but only on capitalism’s terms.
The intent is less nostalgia for 20th-century socialism than a jab at the left’s narrowed imagination. “Global capitalism with a human face” is an intentionally ugly phrase, because it exposes how moral language can become a branding layer. Rights, representation, and procedural safeguards matter, he grants that. But the subtext is that these achievements increasingly operate as compensation for a deeper surrender: accepting the market as the only real horizon, and treating redistribution, public ownership, or decommodification as either naive or impolite.
Context matters here. Zizek is speaking from the post-1989 wreckage where socialist projects collapsed, liberal democracy declared victory, and the “Third Way” taught progressive parties to manage globalization rather than confront it. His Marxist “not enough” is a structural claim: tolerance can coexist with precarity; expanded rights can sit atop privatized essentials; inclusion can happen inside an economy that still produces exclusion as a feature, not a bug. The line works because it refuses the comforting trade: you get dignity, but only on capitalism’s terms.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Slavoj
Add to List





