"Liberal democracy - as you know, in the old days, we were saying we want socialism with a human face. Today's left effectively offers global capitalism with a human face, more tolerance, more rights and so on. So the question is, is this enough or not? Here I remain a Marxist: I think not"

Slavoj Žižek, a prominent contemporary theorist and cultural critic, frequently deals with the contradictions and imperfections of contemporary political and economic systems. In this quote, Žižek recommends that the goals of the contemporary left have shifted over time. He begins by referencing the old socialist slogan of looking for "socialism with a human face", which suggested a desire to humanize and reform socialist systems to guarantee they were more democratic and humane.

On the other hand, Žižek argues that today's left-leaning motions, instead of pursuing a fundamentally different system, are more likely towards reforming worldwide capitalism to make it more humane. This contemporary technique advocates for increased tolerance, broadened rights, and other improvements that ostensibly render commercialism more equitable and inclusive. The expression "global industrialism with a human face" implies making shallow modifications to a basically flawed system instead of addressing its roots.

Žižek concerns whether this effort to humanize commercialism suffices. By saying "I stay a Marxist: I believe not", he aligns himself with Marxist thought, which critiques capitalism at its core and advocates for systemic change instead of simple reforms. Žižek suggests that industrialism, no matter how humanely it's provided, inherently cultivates inequality, exploitation, and alienation. Thus, even with new rights and more tolerance, the system's basic nature stays unchanged.

Žižek's position invites deeper reflection on the adequacy of present leftist policies. Are they perpetuating the status quo by dressing capitalism in progressive clothes, or are they leading towards the transformative systemic changes that Marxism envisions? His critique is a call to analyze whether it suffices to create a kinder industrialism or if authentic progress needs more radical change that attends to the foundational structures of society.