"Man..must necessarily be subject to the laws of his Creator, for he is entirely a dependent being..And, consequently, as man depends absolutely upon his Maker for everything, it is necessary that he should in all points conform to his Maker's will"
About this Quote
A judge telling you that you are "entirely a dependent being" isn’t piety; it’s jurisdiction. Blackstone’s line reads like theology, but its real work is legal: it grounds the legitimacy of human law in something higher, sturdier, and conveniently unappealable. If rights and duties flow from a Creator, then the court isn’t merely enforcing a king’s edict or Parliament’s whim. It’s aligning civil order with a cosmic chain of command.
The specific intent is to naturalize obedience. Blackstone moves quickly from a claim about dependence ("depends absolutely...for everything") to a conclusion about conformity ("in all points"). That jump matters. Dependence becomes total obligation, leaving little room for dissent that isn’t also rebellion against the structure of reality. As rhetoric, it’s a tightening noose: once you accept the premise of absolute dependence, the rest follows with grim inevitability.
The subtext is both stabilizing and strategic. Stabilizing, because 18th-century Britain needed a moral grammar that could hold together tradition, hierarchy, and property under pressures of modernity. Strategic, because divine-law talk lets a jurist present contested norms as neutral facts. It’s not the judge choosing; it’s the universe.
Context sharpens the edge. Blackstone’s Commentaries helped codify common law for generations, especially in the Anglo-American world. That makes this sentence less a private confession than a blueprint for authority: human freedom is imaginable, but only inside a fence built by "the Maker’s will" - and policed, on earth, by men in robes.
The specific intent is to naturalize obedience. Blackstone moves quickly from a claim about dependence ("depends absolutely...for everything") to a conclusion about conformity ("in all points"). That jump matters. Dependence becomes total obligation, leaving little room for dissent that isn’t also rebellion against the structure of reality. As rhetoric, it’s a tightening noose: once you accept the premise of absolute dependence, the rest follows with grim inevitability.
The subtext is both stabilizing and strategic. Stabilizing, because 18th-century Britain needed a moral grammar that could hold together tradition, hierarchy, and property under pressures of modernity. Strategic, because divine-law talk lets a jurist present contested norms as neutral facts. It’s not the judge choosing; it’s the universe.
Context sharpens the edge. Blackstone’s Commentaries helped codify common law for generations, especially in the Anglo-American world. That makes this sentence less a private confession than a blueprint for authority: human freedom is imaginable, but only inside a fence built by "the Maker’s will" - and policed, on earth, by men in robes.
Quote Details
| Topic | God |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by William
Add to List









