"Michigan is also the only industrial state that has a AAA credit rating"
About this Quote
John Engler highlights fiscal credibility as a competitive asset, framing Michigan not just as a manufacturing powerhouse but as a disciplined steward of public finances. A AAA credit rating, awarded by major agencies to governments deemed exceptionally reliable, signals low default risk and strong budget management. For a state tied so closely to cyclical industries like autos and durable goods, that seal of approval stands out. It says the books balance even when factories slow, and that policymakers have built cushions and controls to handle volatility.
The phrase industrial state does important work. It sets Michigan apart from service- or energy-heavy peers by implying a harsher economic climate: capital-intensive plants, union contracts, pension obligations, and exposure to global demand swings. Many Midwestern neighbors struggled with deindustrialization and revenue shocks; some endured downgrades as tax bases eroded or long-term liabilities mounted. Claiming the lone AAA within that cohort presents Michigan as an exception, a place that married manufacturing identity to prudence.
Engler’s boast also functions as a policy defense. Lower borrowing costs flow from top ratings, trimming interest on highways, schools, and water systems and freeing dollars for other priorities. The rating doubles as an external audit of governance, a shorthand for business recruitment: invest here, the state is stable. In the 1990s, Michigan pursued balanced budgets, built reserves, and emphasized restructuring and work-oriented welfare policies. That mix, amid a strong national economy, helped impress ratings agencies.
Still, a AAA label does not settle every question. It does not measure equity, local fiscal health, or the social costs that can accompany austerity. Detroit’s later bankruptcy showed how uneven financial strength can be within a state. Yet Engler’s line captures a deliberate narrative: in a region tagged as the Rust Belt, Michigan asserted that it could be both industrial and impeccably creditworthy, signaling resilience to investors and voters alike.
The phrase industrial state does important work. It sets Michigan apart from service- or energy-heavy peers by implying a harsher economic climate: capital-intensive plants, union contracts, pension obligations, and exposure to global demand swings. Many Midwestern neighbors struggled with deindustrialization and revenue shocks; some endured downgrades as tax bases eroded or long-term liabilities mounted. Claiming the lone AAA within that cohort presents Michigan as an exception, a place that married manufacturing identity to prudence.
Engler’s boast also functions as a policy defense. Lower borrowing costs flow from top ratings, trimming interest on highways, schools, and water systems and freeing dollars for other priorities. The rating doubles as an external audit of governance, a shorthand for business recruitment: invest here, the state is stable. In the 1990s, Michigan pursued balanced budgets, built reserves, and emphasized restructuring and work-oriented welfare policies. That mix, amid a strong national economy, helped impress ratings agencies.
Still, a AAA label does not settle every question. It does not measure equity, local fiscal health, or the social costs that can accompany austerity. Detroit’s later bankruptcy showed how uneven financial strength can be within a state. Yet Engler’s line captures a deliberate narrative: in a region tagged as the Rust Belt, Michigan asserted that it could be both industrial and impeccably creditworthy, signaling resilience to investors and voters alike.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List
