"Miller is not really a writer but a non-stop talker to whom someone has given a typewriter"

This quote by Gerald Brenan is a vital observation of Henry Miller's composing style and tries to communicate the nature of his literary output. To analyze this, it's important to consider a number of elements of both the quote and Miller's more comprehensive literary context.

To start with, the images of a "non-stop talker" being handed a typewriter suggests a sort of raw, unfiltered stream of awareness that Brenan views in Miller's work. This representation suggests that Miller's writing might do not have the careful crafting, structure, and improvement that is usually associated with more traditional literary authors. Rather, his writing could be viewed as direct and spontaneous, as if he just speaks his mind onto the page without much change or censorship.

Brenan appears to be critiquing the viewed absence of discipline in Miller's prose. A "non-stop talker" may suggest redundancy or a propensity to meander, frequently stating much without purposefully working towards a conclusion or clear point. This style can result in prose that is rich in personality but possibly doing not have in focus or clearness. For some, this may recommend a brilliance in recording raw human experience and thought, while for others, it might signify lack of organization or lack of intention.

Furthermore, this interpretation dovetails with Miller's own track record for honest and often controversial narrative styles, frequently instilled with autobiographical components. Understood for works like "Tropic of Cancer", which broke many conventions, Miller was commemorated and slammed for a design that pressed limits both in material and kind.

In essence, Brenan's statement can be seen as both a critique and a backhanded compliment. It acknowledges a distinct, perhaps disorderly energy in Miller's work-- a ruthless profusion of concepts and experiences-- while questioning whether this is the product of literary intent or simple redundancy. This double interpretation invites readers to think about the nature of what makes writing impactful: is it the careful building of prose, or the raw credibility of the voice behind it? Eventually, Brenan's quote obstacles readers to consider the limits of conventional literary craftsmanship versus the power of unchecked expression.