"More negatives write than call. It's a cheap shot for me to go on the air with the critical letters or E-mail I get because the reaction of the listeners is always an instantaneous expression of sympathy for me and contempt for the poor critic"
- John Hall
About this Quote
John Hall's quote uses a reflection on the nature of public feedback and the power dynamics present in media interactions. Hall keeps in mind that critics tend to express their displeasure more frequently through written correspondence, such as letters or emails, rather than through direct discussion, which he refers to as "calling." This distinction highlights the tendency for negative feedback to be conveyed in a more removed manner, allowing critics to preserve a level of anonymity and distance.
Hall describes responding to this criticism on air as a "cheap shot," suggesting an awareness of the fundamental imbalance in this dynamic. By relaying vital letters or emails, Hall positions these anonymous criticisms in a public online forum where his audience can witness them. The ramification here is that his listeners, who most likely are currently encouraging of him provided their option to tune in, are inclined to side with Hall instead of the critic. Hall acknowledges that this assistance manifests as "compassion for me and contempt for the bad critic." This suggests that by sharing these criticisms openly, Hall can almost automatically galvanize his audience's loyalty, developing an 'us vs. them' mindset.
The expression "poor critic" indicates a sense of empathy-- or perhaps condescension-- for those who voice their negativeness. It shows Hall's acknowledgment of the futility or misdirected nature of such criticism within the context of a public, uneven confrontation. His audience's "rapid expression of compassion" further highlights how the medium of shipment influences the reception of criticism. When aired, criticisms lose their initial effect and instead enhance allegiance towards Hall, primarily because the audience views the criticism as an individual attack on somebody they support.
In essence, Hall's declaration is a commentary on the superficial nature of such public fights and reflects the broader social tendency to rally against criticism when it is viewed as unfair or unproven, specifically when provided in such an indirect way.
About the Author