"My point was that the war was intrinsically wrong, and as a result of our participation we haven't improved Australia's security but created a greater danger at home and abroad"

In this quote, Bob Hawke, a previous Prime Minister of Australia, provides an important viewpoint on a military dispute involving Australia. The essence of his argument is that the war itself was basically unjustified, and instead of contributing positively to Australia's nationwide security, involvement in the conflict has actually intensified the risks both locally and worldwide.

Hawke's usage of the term "intrinsically incorrect" suggests a deep moral and ethical condemnation of the war, suggesting that its very nature and function are flawed. This represents a rejection not simply of the functional aspects or outcomes but of the war's core reason. By stating that involvement has not improved but rather intensified security, Hawke challenges the conventional rationale typically utilized to justify military engagements: that they secure or boost a country's security and tactical interests.

The mention of the increased danger "at home and abroad" indicates that the consequences of the war are complex. Domestically, this could indicate heightened vulnerability to hazards such as terrorism, social departments, or political instability. Globally, it suggests that Australia's participation might have strained diplomatic relations, contributed to global instability, or intensified stress, thereby increasing the risk of wider conflict.

Moreover, Hawke's critique most likely shows a broader uncertainty about the efficiency of military interventions as tools for achieving security. It welcomes a reassessment of how security is defined and pursued, recommending that non-military methods might be more reliable or ethical. The declaration can also be interpreted as a moral call to examine the human and monetary expenses of war, questioning whether such sacrifices line up with the concepts and long-lasting interests of the country.

In summary, Hawke's viewpoint provokes a reevaluation of the ethical and tactical measurements of military conflict, promoting for a foreign policy that focuses on justice and genuine security over aggressive intervention.