"Nature has not got two voices, you know, one of them condemning all day what the other commands"

The quote by Marquis de Sade, "Nature has actually not got two voices, you understand, one of them condemning all the time what the other commands", suggests a complicated understanding of natural law and human behavior. In essence, de Sade is challenging the concept of duality within nature, in addition to the viewed conflict between natural instincts and social or ethical laws.

De Sade argues that nature does not possess inconsistent voices or commands. Rather, he presumes that what is deemed natural must not be viewed as having a fundamental ethical conflict. According to de Sade, if nature commands specific habits or instincts, it would not concurrently condemn them. This perspective challenges societal norms that typically represent natural human instincts, such as sexuality or aggressiveness, as unethical.

This quote can be viewed as a critique of the hypocrisy within societal guidelines and the moral codes that human beings produce. Often, societies develop laws and moral structures that contradict natural instincts, potentially resulting in internal conflicts within individuals. De Sade's words welcome readers to question whether societal judgment is warranted when it condemns what is inherently natural.

In addition, this perspective shows de Sade's broader philosophical expedition of liberty and morality. He frequently provoked believed by questioning the origins and legitimacy of restrictions imposed on people by society. By recommending that nature operates with a particular voice, he is advocating for an approval of human nature in its totality, without the enforced dichotomies of great and wicked that often come from cultural or religious dogmas.

In a broader sense, de Sade's statement recommends a look for authenticity and alignment with one's intrinsic nature. It is a call to take a look at the structures of our ethical judgments and to consider whether they genuinely balance with the natural order or simply show constructed societal constraints. This analysis encourages a re-evaluation of how we perceive natural impulses and the principles upon which we build our moral and ethical beliefs.