"Nature provides a free lunch, but only if we control our appetites"
About this Quote
“Nature provides a free lunch” is a deliberately tempting phrase: it borrows the language of bargain-hunting and turns it into an indictment. William Ruckelshaus, a lawyer and founding-era U.S. environmental regulator, knew exactly how seductive it is to treat clean air, fertile soil, and stable climate as costless inputs. The line works because it mimics the pitch of abundance you hear in politics and business, then snaps shut with a condition: “but only if we control our appetites.”
That second clause is where the moral and legal imagination lives. “Appetites” isn’t just consumption; it’s entitlement, the cultural habit of assuming growth is nonnegotiable and consequences are externalities. Ruckelshaus’s legal background matters here: he’s translating ecology into governance. Nature’s “free lunch” is really a common resource, and common resources only stay “free” when rules, restraint, and enforcement prevent the classic tragedy of everyone grabbing seconds. The quote’s subtext is that environmental collapse isn’t a mystery of science; it’s a failure of self-regulation and public regulation.
Contextually, Ruckelshaus spent a career watching environmental policy collide with short-term economic incentives. The sentence is built like a warning label: you can have prosperity that feels effortless, but only if you accept limits. It’s a compact argument for sustainability that refuses both naive optimism (nature will absorb anything) and nihilism (nothing can be done). The “free lunch” exists, but not for gluttons.
That second clause is where the moral and legal imagination lives. “Appetites” isn’t just consumption; it’s entitlement, the cultural habit of assuming growth is nonnegotiable and consequences are externalities. Ruckelshaus’s legal background matters here: he’s translating ecology into governance. Nature’s “free lunch” is really a common resource, and common resources only stay “free” when rules, restraint, and enforcement prevent the classic tragedy of everyone grabbing seconds. The quote’s subtext is that environmental collapse isn’t a mystery of science; it’s a failure of self-regulation and public regulation.
Contextually, Ruckelshaus spent a career watching environmental policy collide with short-term economic incentives. The sentence is built like a warning label: you can have prosperity that feels effortless, but only if you accept limits. It’s a compact argument for sustainability that refuses both naive optimism (nature will absorb anything) and nihilism (nothing can be done). The “free lunch” exists, but not for gluttons.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|
More Quotes by William
Add to List





