"Newspapers that are truly independent, like The Washington Post, can still aggressively investigate anyone or anything with no holds barred"
About this Quote
Independence here isn’t a lofty brand value; it’s a working condition for doing damage in the public interest. Woodward’s line is built like a reassurance and a warning at once: reassure readers that watchdog journalism still exists, warn power that someone can still come for them. The phrase "truly independent" functions as a quiet swipe at outlets that wear independence as a costume while taking cues from owners, advertisers, partisans, or the algorithm. By naming The Washington Post, he’s not just praising an institution; he’s staking a claim in a cultural argument about whether legacy newsrooms still have the spine (and resources) to dig.
"Aggressively investigate" signals his old-school reporting ethic: persistence, document trails, sources, and a willingness to be disliked. It’s also a defense of methods that critics now caricature as elitist or compromised. Woodward is reminding the audience that accountability journalism is less about hot takes than about sustained, unglamorous work that can withstand legal threats and coordinated backlash.
"No holds barred" is the rhetorical flare - almost tabloid in its bravado - but it smuggles in a serious point about constraints. In practice, holds are everywhere: libel law, national security claims, access journalism, internal corporate risk, and the social-media outrage machine. Woodward’s subtext is that independence means having enough institutional insulation to publish anyway. Coming from the Watergate reporter, it’s also a bid to keep a particular myth alive: that a tough newsroom can still puncture the self-protective stories governments and corporations tell about themselves, even in an era that’s trying to make skepticism feel partisan.
"Aggressively investigate" signals his old-school reporting ethic: persistence, document trails, sources, and a willingness to be disliked. It’s also a defense of methods that critics now caricature as elitist or compromised. Woodward is reminding the audience that accountability journalism is less about hot takes than about sustained, unglamorous work that can withstand legal threats and coordinated backlash.
"No holds barred" is the rhetorical flare - almost tabloid in its bravado - but it smuggles in a serious point about constraints. In practice, holds are everywhere: libel law, national security claims, access journalism, internal corporate risk, and the social-media outrage machine. Woodward’s subtext is that independence means having enough institutional insulation to publish anyway. Coming from the Watergate reporter, it’s also a bid to keep a particular myth alive: that a tough newsroom can still puncture the self-protective stories governments and corporations tell about themselves, even in an era that’s trying to make skepticism feel partisan.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Bob
Add to List



