"No, what is important is neither linearity or non-linearity, but the change, the degree of change from something that doesn't move to other events with different tempos in particular"
About this Quote
Stockhausen redirects attention from forms to forces. What matters is not whether events are arranged in a straight line or broken into fragments, but how energy shifts, how quickly or slowly motion arises from stillness, and how tempo relations sculpt our sense of time. He treats music as organized change, with the crucial variable being the degree of change between states: from something that does not move to events moving at different speeds, sometimes simultaneously. The ear locks onto these gradients, sensing acceleration, deceleration, and contrast long before it cares about narrative labels.
This stance underpins his innovations in temporal composition. In works like Zeitmasse and Gruppen he treats tempo as a malleable parameter, bending and layering different speeds across ensembles so that form emerges from the interplay of rates rather than a single teleological line. His electronic pieces, such as Kontakte, magnify this approach by letting him shape transitions at the microtime level, controlling envelopes, modulations, and spatial motion so that the listener experiences a field of evolving tempi and textures. Even his idea of moment form rejects traditional arcs not to embrace chaos, but to focus attention on the intensity and quality of transitions from one self-contained state to another.
There is a perceptual wisdom here. Too little change and time congeals; too much and change becomes noise. The art lies in calibrating thresholds so that shifts register as meaningful inflections of energy. Framed this way, linearity versus non-linearity becomes a secondary question, a byproduct of how change is distributed. The composer becomes a choreographer of rates, curving time so that stasis, pulse, and flux stand in articulate relation. Meaning arises not from destination, but from the felt drift between tempos, the precise shaping of how sound begins to move, how it holds, and how it moves otherwise.
This stance underpins his innovations in temporal composition. In works like Zeitmasse and Gruppen he treats tempo as a malleable parameter, bending and layering different speeds across ensembles so that form emerges from the interplay of rates rather than a single teleological line. His electronic pieces, such as Kontakte, magnify this approach by letting him shape transitions at the microtime level, controlling envelopes, modulations, and spatial motion so that the listener experiences a field of evolving tempi and textures. Even his idea of moment form rejects traditional arcs not to embrace chaos, but to focus attention on the intensity and quality of transitions from one self-contained state to another.
There is a perceptual wisdom here. Too little change and time congeals; too much and change becomes noise. The art lies in calibrating thresholds so that shifts register as meaningful inflections of energy. Framed this way, linearity versus non-linearity becomes a secondary question, a byproduct of how change is distributed. The composer becomes a choreographer of rates, curving time so that stasis, pulse, and flux stand in articulate relation. Meaning arises not from destination, but from the felt drift between tempos, the precise shaping of how sound begins to move, how it holds, and how it moves otherwise.
Quote Details
| Topic | Change |
|---|
More Quotes by Karlheinz
Add to List



