"Nobody wants a judge to be subject to the political whim of the moment"

Stephen Breyer's quote, "Nobody wants a judge to be subject to the political whim of the moment", underlines the essential principle of judicial self-reliance, fundamental to keeping the integrity of a democratic legal system. This statement echoes the requirement that judges run beyond the world of political influences and transient popular opinion, highlighting the expectation that judicial choices be grounded in law and unbiased analysis instead of populist pressure or partisan programs.

Breyer emphasizes that judges need to concentrate on reasonable application of laws - concepts that make sure consistency, fairness, and justice. Their role needs insulation from the roller-coaster of political landscapes which are frequently characterized by fast changes in public sentiment, changing power balances, and moving concerns. Such political dynamics, if intruding on judicial procedures, threat affecting the impartiality of court decisions, causing rulings that might cater more to political expediency instead of legal righteousness.

Furthermore, Breyer's assertion acknowledges the deep trust society locations in the judiciary to run as a neutral arbiter. This trust is important for keeping public confidence in the legal system. If judges bow to political impulses, it threatens this self-confidence, potentially resulting in a perception of bias or partisanship that undermines the public's faith in legal institutions.

Furthermore, Breyer reviews the more comprehensive impacts on democracy. An independent judiciary serves as a look at the other branches of federal government, guaranteeing that legal and executive actions remain within constitutional bounds. Must judges be swayed by political winds, this balance is endangered, possibly enabling overreach and undermining democratic concepts.

In essence, Breyer is advocating for a robust judiciary that can stand up to external pressures and is dedicated entirely to the pursuit of justice. His declaration is a tip of the sustaining need to protect judicial independence as a cornerstone of both justice and democracy.