"Numbers are the product of counting. Quantities are the product of measurement. This means that numbers can conceivably be accurate because there is a discontinuity between each integer and the next"
About this Quote
Bateson draws a sharp boundary between two ways humans make the world intelligible. Counting yields integers, crisp steps where one unit is separate from the next. Measuring yields quantities taken from a continuum where between any two values lies another. Because integers are separated by discontinuities, a count can, in principle, be exact: there are 7 stones on the table, not 7.01. Measurement, by contrast, is always haunted by the grain of reality and the limits of instruments. A length, a temperature, a voltage, a level of stress or trust exists on a sliding scale; we can only approximate it, however many decimal places we report.
Bateson is not belittling quantification; he is warning against a particular seduction. The more digits we attach to a measurement, the more accurate it looks, but we are only refining precision, not escaping the necessity of error bars, calibration, and context. This insight ties to his larger distinction between digital and analog forms of information. Counting is digital, cutting the world into slices. Measuring is analog, mapping patterns and gradients. Both are indispensable, yet the confidence we may place in them differs.
The implications ripple outward. You can count votes with exactness; you cannot measure public sentiment with exactness, however sophisticated the survey. A clinician can count doses; the intensity of pain remains a quantity that resists perfect capture. Policymakers and scientists who forget this difference risk mistaking tidy numerals for certainty, designing incentives and models that fit the digits but miss the living system.
Bateson’s systems thinking emphasizes pattern, relationship, and difference. The discontinuity of numbers gives a clean edge for some descriptions. The continuity of quantities reminds us that much of nature, mind, and society flows. Wisdom lies in joining both modes: count when units are genuinely discrete, measure with humility when they are not, and always keep an eye on the spaces between the marks as well as the marks themselves.
Bateson is not belittling quantification; he is warning against a particular seduction. The more digits we attach to a measurement, the more accurate it looks, but we are only refining precision, not escaping the necessity of error bars, calibration, and context. This insight ties to his larger distinction between digital and analog forms of information. Counting is digital, cutting the world into slices. Measuring is analog, mapping patterns and gradients. Both are indispensable, yet the confidence we may place in them differs.
The implications ripple outward. You can count votes with exactness; you cannot measure public sentiment with exactness, however sophisticated the survey. A clinician can count doses; the intensity of pain remains a quantity that resists perfect capture. Policymakers and scientists who forget this difference risk mistaking tidy numerals for certainty, designing incentives and models that fit the digits but miss the living system.
Bateson’s systems thinking emphasizes pattern, relationship, and difference. The discontinuity of numbers gives a clean edge for some descriptions. The continuity of quantities reminds us that much of nature, mind, and society flows. Wisdom lies in joining both modes: count when units are genuinely discrete, measure with humility when they are not, and always keep an eye on the spaces between the marks as well as the marks themselves.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|
More Quotes by Gregory
Add to List
